Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31844826›Full record

ArticleJBMR plus2019

Does the Prediction Accuracy of Osteoporotic Fractures by BMD and Clinical Risk Factors Vary With Fracture Site?

L Iconaru, M Moreau, V Kinnard, F Baleanu, M Paesmans, R Karmali, J J Body, P Bergmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBMR plus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cluster analysis demonstrates co-existing sites of fragility fracture and associated comorbidities.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Risk factors for imminent fractures: a substudy of the FRISBEE cohort.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  16. Osteoporosis treatment gap in a prospective cohort of volunteer women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

L IconaruDepartment of Endocrinology CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8505-9324
M MoreauData Centre Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.
V KinnardDepartment of Internal Medicine, CHU Brugmann Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.
F BaleanuDepartment of Endocrinology CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.
M PaesmansData Centre Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.
R KarmaliDepartment of Endocrinology CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.
J J BodyDepartment of Endocrinology CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.
P BergmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8998-8382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several clinical risk factors (CRFs) have been shown to predict the risk of fragility fractures independently of BMD, but their accuracy in the prediction of a particular fracture site has not been extensively studied. In this study based on longitudinal data from the FRISBEE cohort (Fracture Risk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry), we evaluated if CRFs are specific for sites of incident osteoporotic fractures during follow-up. We recruited 3560 postmenopausal women, aged 60 to 85 years, from 2007 to 2013, and surveyed yearly for the occurrence of fragility fractures during 6.2 years (median). We analyzed the association between CRFs included in the FRAX (fracture risk assessment tool) model or additional CRFs (falls, sedentary lifestyle, early untreated menopause, diabetes, use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or proton pump inhibitors) and the first incident validated major osteoporotic fracture (MOF;

Indexed as

BMDFRACTURE SITEFRAXOSTEOPOROSISRISK FACTORS

Identifiers

PMID31844826
PMCPMC6894722

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.