ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2020
Impact of Changes to National Hypertension Guidelines on Hypertension Management and Outcomes in the United Kingdom.
Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in first-line monotherapy and combination therapy for hypertension in UK primary care.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Risk of Ischaemic and Non-Ischaemic Heart Failure in People With Type 2 Diabetes: Observational Study in 1.6 Million People in England.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2025Observational
- Enabling scale and spread of technology-enabled remote monitoring of blood pressure at home: findings from a rapid qualitative evaluation.NIHR open research · 2025Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care for hypertension in the UK: a population-based cohort study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Temporal trends in population attributable fractions of modifiable risk factors for dementia: a time-series study of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (2004-2019).BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Attainment of NICE blood pressure targets among older people with newly diagnosed hypertension: nationwide linked electronic health records cohort study.Age and ageing · 2023Article
- The Association of Plasma Amyloid-β and Cognitive Decline in Cognitively Unimpaired Population.Clinical interventions in aging · 2022Article
- Effect of renal denervation on long-term outcomes in patients with resistant hypertension.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021Review
- Impact of changes to national guidelines on hypertension-related workload: an interrupted time series analysis in English primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021Article
- The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.Clinical epidemiology · 2021Article
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and management of hypertension at a cardiac clinic in Kumasi metropolis, Ghana (Commentary).Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, national and international guidelines have recommended the use of out-of-office blood pressure monitoring for diagnosing hypertension. Despite evidence of cost-effectiveness, critics expressed concerns this would increase cardiovascular morbidity. We assessed the impact of these changes on the incidence of hypertension, out-of-office monitoring and cardiovascular morbidity using routine clinical data from English general practices, linked to inpatient hospital, mortality, and socio-economic status data. We studied 3 937 191 adults with median follow-up of 4.2 years (49% men, mean age=39.7 years) between April 1, 2006 and March 31, 2017. Interrupted time series analysis was used to examine the impact of changes to English hypertension guidelines in 2011 on incidence of hypertension (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included rate of out-of-office monitoring and cardiovascular events. Across the study period, incidence of hypertension fell from 2.1 to 1.4 per 100 person-years. The change in guidance in 2011 was not associated with an immediate change in incidence (change in rate=0.01 [95% CI, -0.18-0.20]) but did result in a leveling out of the downward trend (change in yearly trend =0.09 [95% CI, 0.04-0.15]). Ambulatory monitoring increased significantly in 2011/2012 (change in rate =0.52 [95% CI, 0.43-0.60]). The rate of cardiovascular events remained unchanged (change in rate =-0.02 [95% CI, -0.05-0.02]). In summary, changes to hypertension guidelines in 2011 were associated with a stabilisation in incidence and no increase in cardiovascular events. Guidelines should continue to recommend out-of-office monitoring for diagnosis of hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.