Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31865798›Full record

ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2020

Impact of Changes to National Hypertension Guidelines on Hypertension Management and Outcomes in the United Kingdom.

Sarah L Lay-Flurrie, James P Sheppard, Richard J Stevens, Christian Mallen, Carl Heneghan, F D Richard Hobbs, Bryan Williams, Jonathan Mant, Richard J McManus

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Impact of changes to national guidelines on hypertension-related workload: an interrupted time series analysis in English primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah L Lay-FlurrieFrom the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (S.L.L.-F., J.P.S., R.J.S., C.H., F.D.R.H., R.J.M.).
James P SheppardFrom the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (S.L.L.-F., J.P.S., R.J.S., C.H., F.D.R.H., R.J.M.).
Richard J StevensFrom the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (S.L.L.-F., J.P.S., R.J.S., C.H., F.D.R.H., R.J.M.).
Christian MallenSchool for Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK (C.M.).
Carl HeneghanFrom the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (S.L.L.-F., J.P.S., R.J.S., C.H., F.D.R.H., R.J.M.).
F D Richard HobbsFrom the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (S.L.L.-F., J.P.S., R.J.S., C.H., F.D.R.H., R.J.M.).
Bryan WilliamsInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK (B.W.).
Jonathan MantDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (J.M.).
Richard J McManusFrom the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (S.L.L.-F., J.P.S., R.J.S., C.H., F.D.R.H., R.J.M.).
University of Oxford · GBKeele University · GBWilliams (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Department of Health IS-SPC-0514-10043Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-015Department of Health RP_2014-04-026Department of Health RP-PG-0617-20005Medical Research Council MC_PC_11004Medical Research Council MC_PC_13090Wellcome Trust 211182/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, national and international guidelines have recommended the use of out-of-office blood pressure monitoring for diagnosing hypertension. Despite evidence of cost-effectiveness, critics expressed concerns this would increase cardiovascular morbidity. We assessed the impact of these changes on the incidence of hypertension, out-of-office monitoring and cardiovascular morbidity using routine clinical data from English general practices, linked to inpatient hospital, mortality, and socio-economic status data. We studied 3 937 191 adults with median follow-up of 4.2 years (49% men, mean age=39.7 years) between April 1, 2006 and March 31, 2017. Interrupted time series analysis was used to examine the impact of changes to English hypertension guidelines in 2011 on incidence of hypertension (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included rate of out-of-office monitoring and cardiovascular events. Across the study period, incidence of hypertension fell from 2.1 to 1.4 per 100 person-years. The change in guidance in 2011 was not associated with an immediate change in incidence (change in rate=0.01 [95% CI, -0.18-0.20]) but did result in a leveling out of the downward trend (change in yearly trend =0.09 [95% CI, 0.04-0.15]). Ambulatory monitoring increased significantly in 2011/2012 (change in rate =0.52 [95% CI, 0.43-0.60]). The rate of cardiovascular events remained unchanged (change in rate =-0.02 [95% CI, -0.05-0.02]). In summary, changes to hypertension guidelines in 2011 were associated with a stabilisation in incidence and no increase in cardiovascular events. Guidelines should continue to recommend out-of-office monitoring for diagnosis of hypertension.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementPractice Guidelines as TopicAdultAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressuregeneral practicehypertensionmyocardial infarctionpractice guideline

Identifiers

PMID31865798
PMCPMC7055938
OpenAlexW2996956291

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.