Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31893320›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2019

Development of an item pool for a questionnaire on the psychosocial consequences of hypertension labelling.

János Valery Gyuricza, Ana Flávia Pires Lucas d'Oliveira, Lucas Bastos Marcondes Machado, John Brodersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

János Valery GyuriczaDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr Arnaldo, 455 2o andar. CEP, São Paulo, SP, 01246-903, Brazil. jvgyuricza@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7127-4541
Ana Flávia Pires Lucas d'OliveiraDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr Arnaldo, 455 2o andar. CEP, São Paulo, SP, 01246-903, Brazil.
Lucas Bastos Marcondes MachadoHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 225. CEP, São Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
John BrodersenForskningsenheden for Almen Praksis, Center for Sundhed og Samfund, Københavns Universitet, Øster Farimagsgade, Bygning 24. Postboks 2099, 1014, København K, Denmark.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88881.132103/2016-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is the most prevalent risk factor for cardiovascular disease globally. Roughly one-third of the adult population has hypertension. However, most people diagnosed with hypertension do not benefit from blood pressure control with pharmacologic interventions: they are overdiagnosed and overtreated and might experience negative psychosocial consequences of being labelled. These consequences are relevant outcomes that need to be assessed and validly measured to identify all benefits and harms related to interventions designed to prevent cardiovascular disease.

objectivesTo develop a pool of items with high content validity for a draft version of a condition-specific questionnaire to measure the psychosocial consequences of being labelled with mild hypertension.

methodsWe selected relevant items from existing Consequences of Screening (COS) questionnaires. These items belonged to two groups: COS core items and potential condition-specific items. All items were originally in Danish and were translated into Brazilian Portuguese using the dual-panel method. Individual and group interviews were conducted with people with mild hypertension and low risk for cardiovascular disease, and were designed to test the translated items for face and content validity and were also used to generate new relevant items. Structured individual interviews were conducted to categorise all the items into domains.

resultsThe Brazilian Portuguese dual-panel translation of both groups of items was found to be relevant for adults diagnosed with hypertension. We generated 52 new items to achieve high content validity. The result was a set of 132 items divided into 22 domains in 2 parts. Part I was directed at the general population, whereas part II was directed only at people diagnosed with hypertension and it consisted of 38 items in 8 domains. Twelve items remained as single items. High content validity was achieved with the pool of 132 items divided into 22 domains in 2 parts. DISCUSSION: High content validity was achieved for a condition-specific questionnaire measuring the psychosocial consequences of being labelled with mild hypertension. This instrument encompassed 132 items divided into 22 domains in 2 parts. Thereby, a draft of the Consequneces of Hypertension questionnaire (COH) was developed. The psychometric properties of this questionnaire will be discussed in a diferent paper.

Indexed as

HypertensionPatient-reported outcome measurePsychosocial consequences

Identifiers

PMID31893320
PMCPMC6938526
OpenAlexW3013394789

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.