Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31895295›Full record

SynthesisMedicine and science in sports and exercise2020

Predictors of the Acute Postprandial Response to Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting.

Joseph Henson, Charlotte L Edwardson, Carlos A Celis-Morales, Melanie J Davies, David W Dunstan, Dale W Esliger, Jason M R Gill, Aadil Kazi, Kamlesh Khunti, James King and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Physiology of sedentary behavior.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Joseph Henson
Charlotte L Edwardson
Carlos A Celis-MoralesInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UNITED KINGDOM.
Melanie J Davies
David W Dunstan
Dale W Esliger
Jason M R GillInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UNITED KINGDOM.
Aadil KaziNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, UNITED KINGDOM.
Kamlesh Khunti
James King
Matthew McCarthy
Naveed SattarInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UNITED KINGDOM.
David J Stensel
Latha VelayudhanInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London, UNITED KINGDOM.
Francesco Zaccardi
Thomas Yates
NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBCentre College · USBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUEnglish Institute of Sport · GBKing's College London · GBLoughborough University · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

Department of HealthIntramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999Medical Research Council MR/K025090/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify predictors of favorable changes to postprandial insulin and glucose levels in response to interrupting prolonged sitting time with standing or light-intensity physical activity.

methodsData were combined from four similarly designed randomized acute cross-over trials (n = 129; body mass index [BMI] range, 19.6-44.6 kg·m; South Asian = 31.0%; dysglycemia = 27.1%). Treatments included: prolonged sitting (6.5 h) or prolonged sitting broken-up with either standing or light-intensity physical activity (5 min every 30 min). Time-averaged postprandial responses for insulin and glucose were calculated for each treatment (mean ± 95% confidence interval). Mutually adjusted interaction terms were used to examine whether anthropometric (BMI), demographic (age, sex, ethnicity [white European vs South Asian]) and a cardiometabolic variable (Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance)-modified responses.

resultsPostprandial insulin and glucose were reduced when individuals interrupted prolonged sitting with bouts of light physical activity, but not with standing. Reductions in time-averaged postprandial insulin were more pronounced if individuals were South Asian compared with white European (-18.9 mU·L [-23.5%] vs -8.2 mU·L [-9.3%]), female compared with male (-15.0 mU·L [-21.2%] vs -12.1 mU·L [-17.6%]) or had a BMI ≥27.2 kg·m (-20.9 mU·L [-22.9%] vs -8.7 mU·L [-18.2%]). Similarly, being female (-0.4 mmol·L [-0.6 mmol·L, -0.2 mmol·L], -6.8% vs -0.1 mmol·L [-0.3 mmol·L, 1 mmol·L], -1.7%) or having a BMI ≥27.2 kg·m (-0.4 mmol·L [-0.6 mmol·L, -0.2 mmol·L], -6.7% vs -0.2 mmol·L [-0.4 mmol·L, 0.0 mmol·L], -3.4%) modified the postprandial glucose response. No significant interactions were found for Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance or age.

conclusionsBeing female, South Asian, or having a higher BMI, all predicted greater reductions in postprandial insulin, whereas being female and having a higher BMI predicted greater reductions in postprandial glucose when sitting was interrupted with light physical activity. These results could help to guide personalized interventions in high-risk participants for whom breaking prolonged sitting time with light activity may yield the greatest therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorSitting PositionStanding PositionAsian PeopleBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexEnergy MetabolismExerciseHumansInsulinPostprandial PeriodSex FactorsUnited KingdomWhite PeopleBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID31895295
PMCPMC7239738
OpenAlexW2995324615

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.