Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31897953›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2020

JAK inhibitors in refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis.

Elisabetta Miserocchi, Chiara Giuffrè, Martina Cornalba, Irene Pontikaki, Rolando Cimaz

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Ophthalmic manifestation of bilateral ocular toxocariasis: a case-series.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2026
    Article
  6. Noninfectious uveitis: Management with biologic agents.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabetta MiserocchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Vita-Salute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. miserocchi.elisabetta@hsr.it.
Chiara GiuffrèDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Vita-Salute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Martina CornalbaPediatric Rheumatology Unit, ASST G. Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinale Andrea Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Irene PontikakiPediatric Rheumatology Unit, ASST G. Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinale Andrea Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Rolando CimazPediatric Rheumatology Unit, ASST G. Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinale Andrea Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Ferrari (Italy) · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To present our preliminary experience with JAK inhibitors in treating patients affected by juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and associated uveitis. Case series. Four consecutive patients with long-term history of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and severe associated uveitis were included in the study. Indication for treatment with JAK inhibitors was uncontrolled arthritis and/or uveitis despite different treatments with conventional and biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). While on treatment with JAK inhibitors, namely, baricitinib (three cases) and tofacitinib (one case), all our patients showed improvement of uveitis defined as a reduction of intraocular inflammation according to Standardized Uveitis Nomenclature criteria. However, we observed a different response to treatment between the uveitis and the articular disease, as the latter did not respond as favorably as the former. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated by all patients and no ocular discomfort, ocular side effects, or allergic reactions were registered. JAK inhibitors may provide a new valuable treatment option in the therapeutic armamentarium for patients affected with JIA-associated uveitis, particularly in those refractory cases that are not adequately responding to conventional or biologic DMARDs.Key Points• A subset of patients with JIA uveitis either remain unresponsive or experience loss of efficacy• JAK inhibitors may provide a new valuable treatment option in JIA patients with uveitis• The safety profile was good with no occurrence of systemic side effects.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArthritis, JuvenileAzetidinesFemaleHumansJanus Kinase InhibitorsMalePiperidinesPurinesPyrazolesPyrimidinesSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeUveitisVisual AcuityAzetidinesbaricitinibJanus Kinase InhibitorsPiperidinesPurinesPyrazolesPyrimidinesSulfonamidestofacitinibBaricitinibJAK inhibitorsJIA-associated uveitisJuvenile idiopathic arthritisPediatric uveitisTofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID31897953
OpenAlexW2997360929

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.