Evidence mapPaperPMID 31900911Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2019

Prostate Cancer Energetics and Biosynthesis.

Chenchu Lin, Travis C Salzillo, David A Bader, Sandi R Wilkenfeld, Dominik Awad, Thomas L Pulliam, Prasanta Dutta, Shivanand Pudakalakatti, Mark Titus, Sean E McGuire and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. AMPK's double-faced role in advanced stages of prostate cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Metabolic Imaging Using Hyperpolarization for Assessment of Premalignancy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chenchu LinDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Travis C SalzilloDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
David A BaderDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sandi R WilkenfeldDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Dominik AwadDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Thomas L PulliamDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Prasanta DuttaDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Shivanand PudakalakattiDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mark TitusDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sean E McGuireDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Pratip K BhattacharyaDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Daniel E FrigoDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. frigo@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

Washington University Molecular Imaging CenterP50CA094056 · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · 2002 to 2005
$7.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA094056NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184208NCI NIH HHS R21 CA185536NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancers must alter their metabolism to satisfy the increased demand for energy and to produce building blocks that are required to create a rapidly growing tumor. Further, for cancer cells to thrive, they must also adapt to an often changing tumor microenvironment, which can present new metabolic challenges (ex. hypoxia) that are unfavorable for most other cells. As such, altered metabolism is now considered an emerging hallmark of cancer. Like many other malignancies, the metabolism of prostate cancer is considerably different compared to matched benign tissue. However, prostate cancers exhibit distinct metabolic characteristics that set them apart from many other tumor types. In this chapter, we will describe the known alterations in prostate cancer metabolism that occur during initial tumorigenesis and throughout disease progression. In addition, we will highlight upstream regulators that control these metabolic changes. Finally, we will discuss how this new knowledge is being leveraged to improve patient care through the development of novel biomarkers and metabolically targeted therapies.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismCell HypoxiaHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentARImagingMetabolismProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID31900911
PMCPMC8096614
OpenAlexW2998520478

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.