Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31906949›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical science2020

Clinical trials of new drugs for Alzheimer disease.

Li-Kai Huang, Shu-Ping Chao, Chaur-Jong Hu

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 301 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
301citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
77.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

301 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 678 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of c-Abl in Alzheimer's Disease: Guilty or not Guilty?Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. NeuroEPO plus (NeuralCIMAlzheimer's research & therapy · 2023
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and computational studies of chalcone scaffolds as cholinesterase inhibitors.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

241 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Kai HuangDementia Center, Department of Neurology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Shu-Ping ChaoDementia Center, Department of Neurology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chaur-Jong HuDementia Center, Department of Neurology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan. chaurjongh@tmu.edu.tw.
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) accounts for 60-70% of dementia cases. Given the seriousness of the disease and continual increase in patient numbers, developing effective therapies to treat AD has become urgent. Presently, the drugs available for AD treatment, including cholinesterase inhibitors and an antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, can only inhibit dementia symptoms for a limited period of time but cannot stop or reverse disease progression. On the basis of the amyloid hypothesis, many global drug companies have conducted many clinical trials on amyloid clearing therapy but without success. Thus, the amyloid hypothesis may not be completely feasible. The number of anti-amyloid trials decreased in 2019, which might be a turning point. An in-depth and comprehensive understanding of the contribution of amyloid beta and other factors of AD is crucial for developing novel pharmacotherapies.In ongoing clinical trials, researchers have developed and are testing several possible interventions aimed at various targets, including anti-amyloid and anti-tau interventions, neurotransmitter modification, anti-neuroinflammation and neuroprotection interventions, and cognitive enhancement, and interventions to relieve behavioral psychological symptoms. In this article, we present the current state of clinical trials for AD at clinicaltrials.gov. We reviewed the underlying mechanisms of these trials, tried to understand the reason why prior clinical trials failed, and analyzed the future trend of AD clinical trials.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesCholinesterase InhibitorsClinical Trials as TopicHumansReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAmyloid beta-PeptidesCholinesterase InhibitorsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAlzheimer diseaseAnti-amyloidAnti-tauClinical trials of drugsCognitive enhancementNeuroinflammationNeuroprotection

Identifiers

PMID31906949
PMCPMC6943903
OpenAlexW3000635098

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.