Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31907206›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell science2020

Valeria Palumbo, Ammarah Tariq, Lori Borgal, Jeremy Metz, Mara Brancaccio, Maurizio Gatti, James G Wakefield, Silvia Bonaccorsi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Valeria PalumboDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie Sapienza, Università di Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy valeria.palumbo@uniroma1.it j.g.wakefield@exeter.ac.uk.
Ammarah TariqBiosciences/Living Systems Institute, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Lori BorgalBiosciences/Living Systems Institute, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Jeremy MetzBiosciences/Living Systems Institute, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Mara BrancaccioDipartimento di Genetica, Biologia e Biochimica, Università di Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Maurizio GattiDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie Sapienza, Università di Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy.
James G WakefieldBiosciences/Living Systems Institute, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK valeria.palumbo@uniroma1.it j.g.wakefield@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3616-2346
Silvia BonaccorsiDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie Sapienza, Università di Roma, 00185 Rome, Italy.
University of Exeter · GBInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K017937/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morgana (Mora, also known as CHORD in flies) and its mammalian homologue, called CHORDC1 or CHP1, is a highly conserved cysteine and histidine-rich domain (CHORD)-containing protein that has been proposed to function as an Hsp90 co-chaperone. Morgana deregulation promotes carcinogenesis in both mice and humans while, in

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansMicrotubulesMitosisPolymerizationSpindle ApparatusDrosophila ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsDrosophilaEmbryo mitosisHsp90Microtubule bindingMicrotubule polymerisationMorganaSpindle assembly

Identifiers

PMID31907206
PMCPMC6983718
OpenAlexW2996995140

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.