Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31908162›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2020

Prognostic impact over time of ischaemic heart disease vs. non-ischaemic heart disease in heart failure.

Jonas Silverdal, Helen Sjöland, Entela Bollano, Aldina Pivodic, Ulf Dahlström, Michael Fu

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Incidence and risk factors for first and recurrent ICD shock therapy in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure temporality: does it matter?Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas SilverdalDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6088-7868
Helen SjölandDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Entela BollanoDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Aldina PivodicStatistiska Konsultgruppen, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ulf DahlströmDepartment of Cardiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Michael FuDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SELinköping University · SEStatisticon (Sweden) · SE

Funding

Regional ALF agreement between the Region Västra Götaland and University of Gothenburg ALFGBG-721961Swedish Association of Local Authorities and RegionsSwedish Heart-Lung Foundation 20170453Swedish National Board of Health and WelfareSwedish Society of Cardiology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic impact of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in heart failure (HF) and its association to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and HF duration, and furthermore, to evaluate if the impact of IHD has changed over time, in light of improved therapy. METHODS AND

resultsWe studied 30 946 patients with non-valvular HF, by accessing the Swedish Heart Failure Registry, from years 2000 to 2012. The mortality in 17 778 patients with clinical IHD was compared with 13 168 patients without IHD (non-IHD). There was a significantly worse outcome in IHD, with the crude mortality of 41.1% and the event rate per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 14.8 (14.4-15.1), compared with 28.2% and 9.7 (9.4-10.0) in non-IHD. After multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) for mortality, IHD vs. non-IHD, was 1.16 (1.11-1.22; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses showed significantly increased mortality in IHD, in all age subgroups, in all subgroups with EF < 50%, in both men and women, and regardless of heart failure duration more or less than 6 months. Analyses for the combination of age and EF showed the highest HR for time to death in the youngest with the lowest EF, HR (95% CI) 2.05 (1.59-2.64) for patients <60 years of age with EF < 30%. Although a numerical reduction of the HR for mortality was seen over time, the risk for mortality in IHD, compared with the non-IHD group, was greater throughout the study period.

conclusionsIn non-valvular heart failure, IHD was associated with significantly increased mortality, compared with non-IHD, in groups of EF below 50%, in all age groups, and regardless of sex or HF duration. The risk increase associated with EF reduction diminished with increasing age. The mortality in IHD, compared with non-IHD, remained significantly higher throughout the 13 year study period.

Indexed as

RegistriesAgedCause of DeathFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart FailureHumansMaleMyocardial IschemiaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeSurvival RateSwedenVentricular Function, LeftAetiologyChronic ischaemic heart diseaseHeart failureMortality/survivalPrognosisRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID31908162
PMCPMC7083496
OpenAlexW2999181707

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.