Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31912261›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2020

A novel method for electroretinogram assessment in patients with central retinal vein occlusion.

Neda Sefandarmaz, Soroor Behbahani, Alireza Ramezani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. New criteria for evaluation of electroretinogram in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  4. Continuous wavelet transform analysis of ERG in patients with diabetic retinopathy.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neda SefandarmazDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Soroor BehbahaniDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran. Sor.behbahani@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5122-2151
Alireza RamezaniOphthalmic Epidemiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Islamic Azad University of Garmsar · IRIslamic Azad University South Tehran Branch · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 9601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCentral retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disorder after diabetic retinopathy that affects the eyes. We propose a method for distinction of normal and central CRVO eyes based on electroretinogram (ERG).

methodsSeventeen patients with CRVO in one eye were analyzed. Their ERG signals were collected in six different stimuli, including four records in the darkness (dark-adapted 0.01, dark-adapted 3.0, dark-adapted oscillatory potentials, and dark-adapted 10) and two records in brightness (light-adapted 3.0 and light-adapted 30 Hz flicker). Nonlinear features such as Hurst exponent (HE) and approximate entropy (ApEn) were extracted from healthy and CRVO eyes. Finally, a parabolic mapping and two criteria (theta angle and the density of points) were proposed to distinguish the groups.

resultsFor ApEn, the P values of dark-adapted 3.0 oscillatory (P = 0.0433) and flicker (P = 0.0425) confirmed significant differences between the groups. For HE, the P values of dark-adapted 3.0 oscillatory (P = 0.0421) and flicker 30 Hz (P = 0.0402) confirmed differences between the healthy and CRVO groups. The P values of theta angle for dark-adapted 3.0 (P = 0.0199), dark-adapted oscillatory (P = 0.0265), dark-adapted 10.0 (P = 0.0166), light-adapted 3.0 (P = 0.0411), and flicker (P = 0.0361) showed significant differences. Using the density criterion, the statistical test demonstrated a significant difference between the groups in dark-adapted 3 (P = 0.0038), dark-adapted oscillatory (P = 0.0102), dark-adapted 10.0 (P = 0.0071), light-adapted 3.0 (P = 0.0319), and flicker 30 Hz (P = 0.0076).

conclusionThe proposed features have made it possible to distinguish between healthy and CRVO eyes. This method could be helpful in some cases with no definite diagnosis or to estimate the severity of CRVO.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDark AdaptationDiabetic RetinopathyElectroretinographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetinaRetinal Vein OcclusionCentral retinal vein occlusionElectroretinogramFeature extractionParabolic mapping

Identifiers

PMID31912261
OpenAlexW2999951856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.