Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31917870›Full record

SynthesisNeurourology and urodynamics2020

Normative noninvasive bladder function measurements in healthy women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jean F Wyman, Jincheng Zhou, D Yvette LaCoursiere, Alayne D Markland, Elizabeth R Mueller, Laura Simon, Ann Stapleton, Carolyn R T Stoll, Haitao Chu, Siobhan Sutcliffe

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Urodynamics in Early Diagnosis of Diabetic Bladder Dysfunction in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Validation of bladder health scales and function indices for women's research.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jean F WymanSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-8469
Jincheng ZhouDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
D Yvette LaCoursiereDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, LaJolla, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6694-4421
Alayne D MarklandDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.ORCID 0000-0002-6567-6744
Elizabeth R MuellerDepartments of Urology and Obstetrics/Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-3069-4069
Laura SimonBernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-3760-6810
Ann StapletonDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-0130-8659
Carolyn R T StollDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-6951-4219
Haitao ChuDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-0932-598X
Siobhan SutcliffeDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-4613-8107
University of Minnesota · USWashington University in St. Louis · USLoyola University Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Women: Bladder Health Scientific and Data Coordinating Center (PLUS-SDCC) (U01)U01DK106786 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HARLOW, BERNARD L, RUDSER, KYLE · 2015 to 2019
$8.4M
University of Pennsylvania+ PLUS Clinical Center (PENN+PLUS CC)U01DK106892 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI NEWMAN, DIANE K., SMITH, ARIANA L · 2015 to 2024
$5.4M
PLUS Loyola Clinical CenterU01DK106898 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA, FITZGERALD, COLLEEN MARIE · 2015 to 2024
$4.7M
Prevention of LUTS: Bladder Health Clinical Center, UC San Diego SiteU01DK106827 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LACOURSIERE, DAPHNE YVETTE, LUKACZ, EMILY S. · 2015 to 2024
$4.5M
Pathways to LUTS Prevention: A Model for Public Education, Behavioral Skills, and Early DetectionU01DK106858 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MCGWIN, GERALD · 2015 to 2024
$4.5M
LUTS PREVENTION IN ADOLESCENT GIRLS AND WOMEN ACROSS THE LIFESPANU01DK106853 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SUTCLIFFE, SIOBHAN · 2015 to 2024
$4.0M
The Truly Healthy Bladder: Understanding Normal As A Pathway To Prevention Of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms In WomenU01DK106893 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LOW, LISA KANE · 2015 to 2024
$3.8M
Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium Yale Clinical Research CenterU01DK106908 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI RICKEY, LESLIE M. · 2015 to 2024
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK106786NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK106827NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK106853NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK106858NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK106892NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK106893NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK106898NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK106908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo conduct an evidence synthesis of normative reference values for bladder function parameters in women.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting bladder function parameters obtained from noninvasive tests in healthy women. Seven databases were searched for relevant studies from inception through December 2018, with manual searching of reference lists. We included English language articles that provided quantitative data on urination frequency, voided and postvoid residual volumes, and uroflowmetry results in women without lower urinary tract symptoms. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were undertaken by at least two independent reviewers. Random-effects meta-analytic models were used to derive study-level pooled mean estimates and 95% confidence intervals.

resultsA total of 24 studies (N = 3090 women, age range, 18-91 years) met eligibility criteria. Pooled mean estimates of bladder function parameters were: 6.6 daytime voids (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 6.2, 7.0), 0.4 nighttime voids (95% CI, 0.0, 0.8), 1577 mL for 24-hour voided volume (95% CI 1428,1725); 12 mL for postvoid residual volume (95% CI, 4, 20); and 28 mL/sec for maximum flow rate (95% CI, 27,30). Between-study heterogeneity was high for all outcomes (I

conclusionAlthough summary mean estimates of bladder function parameters were calculated, the wide heterogeneity across studies precludes generalization of these estimates to all healthy women. Further research is needed to determine normative reference values within specific groups, such as those defined by age.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLower Urinary Tract SymptomsMiddle AgedUrinary BladderUrinationUrodynamicsYoung AdultReference valuesurinary frequencyurinary volumeuroflowmetryvoiding

Identifiers

PMID31917870
PMCPMC7012752
OpenAlexW2999907303

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.