Evidence mapPaperPMID 31921665Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2019

Anakoinosis: Correcting Aberrant Homeostasis of Cancer Tissue-Going Beyond Apoptosis Induction.

Daniel Heudobler, Florian Lüke, Martin Vogelhuber, Sebastian Klobuch, Tobias Pukrop, Wolfgang Herr, Christopher Gerner, Pan Pantziarka, Lina Ghibelli, Albrecht Reichle

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Drug Repurposing by Tumor Tissue Editing.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Daniel HeudoblerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Florian LükeDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin VogelhuberDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Sebastian KlobuchDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Tobias PukropDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Wolfgang HerrDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christopher GernerInstitut for Analytical Chemistry, Faculty Chemistry, University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pan PantziarkaThe George Pantziarka TP53 Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Lina GhibelliDepartment Biology, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Albrecht ReichleDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEAnticancer Fund · BEUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current approach to systemic therapy for metastatic cancer is aimed predominantly at inducing apoptosis of cancer cells by blocking tumor-promoting signaling pathways or by eradicating cell compartments within the tumor. In contrast, a systems view of therapy primarily considers the communication protocols that exist at multiple levels within the tumor complex, and the role of key regulators of such systems. Such regulators may have far-reaching influence on tumor response to therapy and therefore patient survival. This implies that neoplasia may be considered as a cell non-autonomous disease. The multi-scale activity ranges from intra-tumor cell compartments, to the tumor, to the tumor-harboring organ to the organism. In contrast to molecularly targeted therapies, a systems approach that identifies the complex communications networks driving tumor growth offers the prospect of disrupting or "normalizing" such aberrant communicative behaviors and therefore attenuating tumor growth. Communicative reprogramming, a treatment strategy referred to as anakoinosis, requires novel therapeutic instruments, so-called master modifiers to deliver concerted tumor growth-attenuating action. The diversity of biological outcomes following pro-anakoinotic tumor therapy, such as differentiation, trans-differentiation, control of tumor-associated inflammation, etc. demonstrates that long-term tumor control may occur in multiple forms, inducing even continuous complete remission. Accordingly, pro-anakoinotic therapies dramatically extend the repertoire for achieving tumor control and may activate apoptosis pathways for controlling resistant metastatic tumor disease and hematologic neoplasia.

Indexed as

anakoinosiscommunicative reprogrammingmaster modifiersmetastatic tumorsreprogramming information fluxsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID31921665
PMCPMC6934003
OpenAlexW2989878150

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.