Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31936076›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Snacking and Weight among Adolescents: A Scoping Review.

Victoria G Williamson, Abhaya Dilip, Julia Rose Dillard, Jane Morgan-Daniel, Alexandra M Lee, Michelle I Cardel

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. COVID-19 and waste management in Indian scenario: challenges and possible solutions.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria G WilliamsonDepartment of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Abhaya DilipDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Julia Rose DillardDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Jane Morgan-DanielHealth Science Center Libraries, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Alexandra M LeeDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Michelle I CardelDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Florida Health Science Center · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

Acceptance-Based Therapy Weight Loss Intervention for Adolescents: A Pilot, Randomized Controlled TrialK01HL141535 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CARDEL, MICHELLE · 2018 to 2020
$455k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL141535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eating behaviors, including unhealthy snacking or excessive snacking leading to excess calorie consumption, may contribute to obesity among adolescents. Socioeconomic status (SES) also significantly influences eating behaviors, and low SES is associated with increased risk for obesity. However, little is known regarding the relationship between snacking behavior and SES among adolescents and how this may contribute to obesity-related outcomes. The primary objective of this scoping review was to review the literature to assess and characterize the relationship between SES and snacking in adolescents. The secondary objective was to assess weight-related outcomes and their relation to snacking habits. Included articles were published between January 2000 and May 2019; written in English, Portuguese, or Spanish; and focused on adolescents (13-17 years). In total, 14 bibliographic databases were searched, and seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Preliminary evidence from the seven included studies suggests a weak but potential link between SES and snacking. Additionally, these dietary patterns seemed to differ by sex and income type of country. Finally, only three of the included studies addressed weight-related outcomes, but the overall available evidence suggests that snacking does not significantly affect weight-related outcomes. Due to the small number of included studies, results should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorOverweightSnacksAdolescentHumansSocioeconomic Factorsadolescentsobesityreviewsnackingsocioeconomic statusweight-related outcomes

Identifiers

PMID31936076
PMCPMC7019740
OpenAlexW3000325416

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.