Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31937330›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2020

Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up.

Peng Zhu, Haifeng Qiang, Fei Liu, Peng Xie, Shaoyi Zheng, Yong Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peng ZhuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, NanFang hospital, Southern Medical University, GuangZhou, People's Republic of China.
Haifeng QiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Fei LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Peng XieDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Shaoyi ZhengDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, NanFang hospital, Southern Medical University, GuangZhou, People's Republic of China.
Yong SunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China. yongsun1999@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2673-8383
Xiamen University · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

Fundación para el Fomento en Asturias de la Investigación Científica Aplicada y la Tecnología No.3502Z20164055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe percutaneous closure of a single secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) under transesophageal echocardiography guidance as an accepted alternative to the transcatheter closure with fluoroscopy has been proven. However, the technique has not been routinely used. This study was to present and share our experience in comparing the clinical outcomes of the percutaneous and intra-operative device closure (IODC) of atrial septal defects without fluoroscopy.

methodsFrom January 2013 to December 2016, 103 patients with maximum diameters of ASD of less than 30 mm were allocated to groups taking either the percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects approach (PASD group, n = 53) or the intra-operative device closure approach (IODC Group, n = 50). They were operated on using the minimally invasive Amplatzer duct occluder under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography without cardiopulmonary bypass. Echocardiography was performed to obtain an en face view of the ASD and important surrounding structures before the operation. Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and follow-up data were retrospectively documented and analyzed.

resultsPatient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. These were no differences in the maximum diameters of defects and the size of the occluders in each group (16.4 ± 5.3 mm vs16.4 ± 5.2 mm, P = 0.98; 22.4 ± 5.8 mm vs 21.3 ± 6.6 mm, P = 0.38). Intracardiac manipulation time was 20.72 ± 7.70 min in the PASD group and 6.01 ± 1.03 min in the IODC group (P < 0.001). The procedure time was 28.70 ± 10.41 min in the PASD group and 39.13 ± 6.03 min in the IODC group (P < 0.001). The successful closure defect was 100% in both groups when the maximum diameter of defect less than 25 mm. Four patients the PASD groups with maximum diameters between 25 mm and 30 mm were transferred to the IOCD group after unsuccessful device implantations. The total occlusion rate was 82% immediately after deployment, 98% at 3 months, and 100% at 6 months. No cardiac-related complications occurred during the follow-up period of between 3 to 65 months (mean 21.4 ± 9.8 months).

conclusionsPercutaneous device closures of Secundum atrial septal defects showed safety and high efficiency in patients under guidance by transesophageal echocardiography when compared with intra-operative device closures and are especially suited for women and children.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, TransesophagealSeptal Occluder DeviceAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Septal Defects, AtrialHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis ImplantationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAtrial septal defectDeviceMinimally invasive surgeryPercutaneous

Identifiers

PMID31937330
PMCPMC6961376
OpenAlexW3004933637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.