Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31938804›Full record

ReviewHerz2021

[Coronary physiology in the catheter laboratory].

Stefan Baumann, Waldemar Bojara, Heiner Post, Tanja Rudolph, Tim Schäufele, Peter Ong, Ralf Lehmann, Constantin von Zur Mühlen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefan BaumannI. Medizinische Klinik, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Pneumologie, Angiologie und internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg und Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Standort Heidelberg/Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. stefan.baumann@umm.de.
Waldemar BojaraKemperhof II, Abteilung für Kardiologie, Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein, Koblenz, Deutschland.
Heiner PostKlinik für Kardiologie, Contilia Herz- und Gefäßzentrum, St. Marien-Hospital Mülheim, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Deutschland.
Tanja RudolphAbteilung für Kardiologie, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Deutschland.
Tim SchäufeleUniversitätsklinik für Kardiologie, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Schweiz.
Peter OngAbteilung für Kardiologie, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
Ralf LehmannMedizinische Klinik I, Kardiologie, Angiologie, Internistische Intensivmedizin, Asklepios Kliniken Langen-Seligenstadt GmbH, Langen-Seligenstadt, Deutschland.
Constantin von Zur MühlenUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen und Medizinische Fakultät Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Asklepios Klinik Langen · DEGemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEHeart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia · DERobert Bosch Hospital · DESt. Marien Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulation of coronary flow is mainly located in the resistance vessels of the microcirculation, so that the functional relevance of a coronary stenosis arises from the interaction between the epicardial stenosis and the downstream microcirculation. These complex interactions are precisely detectable by physiological measurements, such as the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iwFR) or the fractional flow reserve (FFR). In contrast, the purely visual assessment of the coronary anatomy could lead to misinterpretation and possibly to incorrect revascularization decisions. Consequently, in the current guidelines on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) the measurement of iwFR and FFR has a class IA indication in intermediate stenoses with unclear hemodynamic relevance. Despite this clear recommendation, physiological measurements are not yet regularly used in the clinical routine. Besides the purely hemodynamic assessment, novel methods such as co-registration and coronary mapping can be used for virtual planning of percutaneous coronary interventions, especially in vessels with diffuse lesions and serial stenoses. Furthermore, invasive flow measurements are also helpful for risk stratification between conservative and interventional treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome, where additional factors of flow limitation, such as coronary spasm, thrombus and acute disturbance of the microcirculation play an important role.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialCardiac CatheterizationCathetersCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsHumansLaboratoriesPredictive Value of TestsSeverity of Illness IndexCoronary artery diseaseFractional flow reserveInstantaneous wave-free ratioIschemiaRevascularization

Identifiers

PMID31938804
OpenAlexW3000676011

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.