Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31939629›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2020

A 21‑gene Support Vector Machine classifier and a 10‑gene risk score system constructed for patients with gastric cancer.

Hui Jiang, Jiming Gu, Jun Du, Xiaowei Qi, Chengjia Qian, Bojian Fei

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review of Prognostic Gene Signature in Gastric Cancer Patients.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hui JiangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, P.R. China.
Jiming GuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, P.R. China.
Jun DuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, P.R. China.
Xiaowei QiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, P.R. China.
Chengjia QianDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, P.R. China.
Bojian FeiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214062, P.R. China.
Wuxi Fourth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks fifth in terms of incidence and third in terms of tumor mortality worldwide. The present study was designed to construct a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier and risk score system for GC. The GSE62254 (training set) and GSE26253 (validation set 2) datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Furthermore, the gene expression profile of GC (validation set 1) was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between recurrent and non‑recurrent samples were determined using the limma package. The feature genes were selected using the Caret package, and an SVM classifier was built using the e1071 package. Using the penalized package, the optimal predictive genes for constructing a risk score system were screened. Finally, stratification analysis of clinical factors and pathway enrichment analysis were performed using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. A total of 239 DEGs were identified in GSE62254, among which 114 DEGs were significantly associated with both recurrence‑free survival and overall survival. Subsequently, 21 feature genes were screened from the 114 DEGs, and an SVM classifier was built. A risk score system for survival prediction was constructed, following the selection of 10 optimal genes, including A‑kinase anchoring protein 12, angiopoietin‑like protein 1, cysteine‑rich sequence 1, myeloid/lymphoid or mixed‑lineage leukemia, translocated to chromosome 11, neuron navigator 3, neurobeachin, nephroblastoma overexpressed, pleiotrophin, tumor suppressor candidate 3 and zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 18. The stratification analysis revealed that pathological stage was an independent prognostic clinical factor in the high‑risk group. Additionally, eight significant pathways were associated with the 10‑gene signature. The SVM classifier and risk score system may be applied for classifying and predicting the prognosis of patients with GC, respectively.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAgedA Kinase Anchor ProteinsAngiopoietin-Like Protein 1Angiopoietin-like ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCytokinesDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMembrane ProteinsA Kinase Anchor ProteinsAngiopoietin-Like Protein 1Angiopoietin-like ProteinsANGPTL1 protein, humanCarrier ProteinsCytokinesMembrane ProteinsNAV3 protein, humanNBEA protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinspleiotrophinTumor Suppressor ProteinsTUSC3 protein, humanDEGsGCrisk score systemstratification analysisSVM

Identifiers

PMID31939629
PMCPMC6896370
OpenAlexW2991386646

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.