ReviewPLoS pathogens2020
The CRISPR toolbox in medical mycology: State of the art and perspectives.
Review in PLoS pathogens, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- COVID-19-Associated Fungal Co-Infections: Pathogenesis, Diagnostics, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- EditingBiomolecules · 2026Review
- Genetic Manipulation inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Interconnected worlds: a comprehensive review of fungal defenses, antimicrobial resistance, and their evolutionary dynamics.IMA fungus · 2026Review
- A systematic comparison of CRISPR-Cas9 allele editing in Candida auris demonstrates unreliable cassette integration and effective episomal plasmid-based editing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comparative evaluation of CRISPR-Cas9 allele editing systems inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The transcriptional regulatorCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
- Unlocking the potential of experimental evolution to study drug resistance in pathogenic fungi.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2024Review
- Article
- An efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system based on a multiple sgRNA processing platform in Trichoderma reesei for strain improvement and enzyme production.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024Article
- Efficient multiple gene knockout in Colletotrichum higginsianum via CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein and URA3-based marker recycling.Molecular plant pathology · 2023Article
- CRISPR-Cas Technology for Bioengineering Conventional and Non-Conventional Yeasts: Progress and New Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Combating increased antifungal drug resistance inActa biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023Review
- Development and applications of a CRISPR activation system for facile genetic overexpression in Candida albicans.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Determinants of fluconazole resistance and echinocandin tolerance inEmerging microbes & infections · 2022Article
- CRISPR/Cas9‑induced saturated mutagenesis identifiesMolecular medicine reports · 2022Article
- Exploring a novel genomic safe-haven site in the human pathogenic mould Aspergillus fumigatus.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2022Article
- SynBioStrainFinder: A microbial strain database of manually curated CRISPR/Cas genetic manipulation system information for biomanufacturing.Microbial cell factories · 2022Article
- CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing in the Human Fungal Pathogen C. albicans.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Exploring nano-enabled CRISPR-Cas-powered strategies for efficient diagnostics and treatment of infectious diseases.Journal of nanostructure in chemistry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungal pathogens represent a major human threat affecting more than a billion people worldwide. Invasive infections are on the rise, which is of considerable concern because they are accompanied by an escalation of antifungal resistance. Deciphering the mechanisms underlying virulence traits and drug resistance strongly relies on genetic manipulation techniques such as generating mutant strains carrying specific mutations, or gene deletions. However, these processes have often been time-consuming and cumbersome in fungi due to a number of complications, depending on the species (e.g., diploid genomes, lack of a sexual cycle, low efficiency of transformation and/or homologous recombination, lack of cloning vectors, nonconventional codon usage, and paucity of dominant selectable markers). These issues are increasingly being addressed by applying clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 mediated genetic manipulation to medically relevant fungi. Here, we summarize the state of the art of CRISPR-Cas9 applications in four major human fungal pathogen lineages: Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Mucorales. We highlight the different ways in which CRISPR has been customized to address the critical issues in different species, including different strategies to deliver the CRISPR-Cas9 elements, their transient or permanent expression, use of codon-optimized CAS9, and methods of marker recycling and scarless editing. Some approaches facilitate a more efficient use of homology-directed repair in fungi in which nonhomologous end joining is more commonly used to repair double-strand breaks (DSBs). Moreover, we highlight the most promising future perspectives, including gene drives, programmable base editors, and nonediting applications, some of which are currently available only in model fungi but may be adapted for future applications in pathogenic species. Finally, this review discusses how the further evolution of CRISPR technology will allow mycologists to tackle the multifaceted issue of fungal pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.