Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31958182›Full record

ArticleCancer science2020

Using next-generation sequencing to redefine BRCAness in triple-negative breast cancer.

Po-Han Lin, Ming Chen, Li-Wei Tsai, Chiao Lo, Tzu-Chun Yen, Thomas Yoyan Huang, Chih-Kai Chen, Sheng-Chih Fan, Sung-Hsin Kuo, Chiun-Sheng Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Po-Han LinDepartment of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-398X
Ming ChenDepartment of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li-Wei TsaiDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chiao LoDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tzu-Chun YenDepartment of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Thomas Yoyan HuangDepartment of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Kai ChenDepartment of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sheng-Chih FanDepartment of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sung-Hsin KuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chiun-Sheng HuangDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology 103-2314-B-002-005-MY2Ministry of Science and Technology 104-2314-B-002-106-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology MOST 106-2314-B-002-114-MY3National Taiwan University Hospital 104-N2901National Taiwan University Hospital 105-N3285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRCAness is considered a predictive biomarker to platinum and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, recent trials showed that its predictive value was limited in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with platinum. Moreover, tumors with mutations of DNA damage response (DDR) genes, such as homologous recombination (HR) genes, could be sensitive to platinum and PARP inhibitors. Thus, we aim to explore the relationship between mutation status of DDR genes and BRCAness in TNBC. We sequenced 56 DDR genes in 120 TNBC and identified BRCAness by array comparative genomic hybridization. The sequencing results showed that 13, 14, and 14 patients had BRCA, non-BRCA HR, and non-HR DDR gene mutations, respectively. Array comparative genomic hybridization revealed that BRCA-mutated and HR gene-mutated TNBC shared similar BRCAness features, both having higher numbers and longer length of large-scale structural aberration (LSA, >10 Mb) and similar altered chromosomal regions of LSA. These suggested non-BRCA HR gene-mutated TNBC shared similar characteristics with BRCA-mutated TNBC, indicating non-BRCA HR gene-mutated TNBC sensitive to platinum and PARP inhibitors. Among tumors with mutation of non-HR DDR genes, 3 PTEN and 1 MSH6 mutation also contained significant LSAs (BRCAness); however, they had different regions of genomic alteration to BRCA and HR gene-mutated tumors, might explain prior findings that PTEN- and MSH6-mutated cancer cells not sensitive to PARP inhibitors. Therefore, we hypothesize that the heterogeneous genomic background of BRCAness indicates different responsiveness to platinum and PARP inhibitors. Direct sequencing DDR genes in TNBC should be applied to predict their sensitivity toward platinum and PARP inhibitors.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDNA DamageFemaleHomologous RecombinationHumansMiddle AgedMutationPlatinumPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanPlatinumPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53BRCAnessDNA damage responsePARP inhibitorplatinumtriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID31958182
PMCPMC7156820
OpenAlexW3001165546

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.