Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31964246›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2020

Polymorphisms in dipeptidyl peptidase 4 reduce host cell entry of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus.

Hannah Kleine-Weber, Simon Schroeder, Nadine Krüger, Alexander Prokscha, Hassan Y Naim, Marcel A Müller, Christian Drosten, Stefan Pöhlmann, Markus Hoffmann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04542213 (Effect of the Combination of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04542213 phase3completednot on this map

Effect of the Combination of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor (DPP4i) and Insulin in Comparison to Insulin on Metabolic Control and Prognosis in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del BajioRan2020 to 2021Enrolled70ConditionsHyperglycemia, Covid19ArmsLinagliptin tablet, Insulin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Hannah Kleine-WeberInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Simon SchroederCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Virology, Berlin, Germany.
Nadine KrügerInstitute of Virology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4413-8699
Alexander ProkschaDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Hassan Y NaimDepartment of Physiological Chemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4884-8425
Marcel A MüllerCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Virology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2242-5117
Christian DrostenCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Virology, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan PöhlmannInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6086-9136
Markus HoffmannInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4603-7696
German Primate Center · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DESechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus (MERS-CoV) causes a severe respiratory disease in humans. The MERS-CoV spike (S) glycoprotein mediates viral entry into target cells. For this, MERS-CoV S engages the host cell protein dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4, CD26) and the interface between MERS-CoV S and DPP4 has been resolved on the atomic level. Here, we asked whether naturally-occurring polymorphisms in DPP4, that alter amino acid residues required for MERS-CoV S binding, influence cellular entry of MERS-CoV. By screening of public databases, we identified fourteen such polymorphisms. Introduction of the respective mutations into DPP4 revealed that all except one (Δ346-348) were compatible with robust DPP4 expression. Four polymorphisms (K267E, K267N, A291P and Δ346-348) strongly reduced binding of MERS-CoV S to DPP4 and S protein-driven host cell entry, as determined using soluble S protein and S protein bearing rhabdoviral vectors, respectively. Two polymorphisms (K267E and A291P) were analyzed in the context of authentic MERS-CoV and were found to attenuate viral replication. Collectively, we identified naturally-occurring polymorphisms in DPP4 that negatively impact cellular entry of MERS-CoV and might thus modulate MERS development in infected patients.

Indexed as

Virus InternalizationCoronavirus InfectionsDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Host-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusPolymorphism, GeneticDipeptidyl Peptidase 4DPP4 protein, humandipeptidyl peptidase 4Middle East respiratory syndrome coronaviruspolymorphismsreceptor bindingspike glycoprotein

Identifiers

PMID31964246
PMCPMC7006675
OpenAlexW3002515794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.