ReviewAnnals of neurosciences2019
Development and implementation of ZED-YOG quality module:
Review in Annals of neurosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Approach to COVID-19: An Indian Facebook Recipe for Mental Health.Annals of neurosciences · 2021Review
- Enhancing the Psychological Well-Being of Frontline Essential Service Providers of COVID-19.Annals of neurosciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGovernment initiatives and schemes for global healthcare improvement require efficient implementation which can transform the quality standards. We redefined the purview of Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) in the basic research investigations in order to create a benchmark of quality standards for conducting translational research.
methodsWe propose SUMMARY: This strategy can not only promote enhanced data scrutiny, validation but also health awareness. KEY MESSAGE:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.