Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31976169›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

A systematic review of the application of machine learning in the detection and classification of transposable elements.

Simon Orozco-Arias, Gustavo Isaza, Romain Guyot, Reinel Tabares-Soto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Finding and Characterizing Repeats in Plant Genomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. PeerJ · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon Orozco-AriasDepartment of Computer Science, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5991-8770
Gustavo IsazaDepartment of Systems and Informatics, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.
Romain GuyotInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, CIRAD, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Reinel Tabares-SotoDepartment of Electronics and Automation, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.
University of Caldas · COCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRUniversidad Autonoma de Manizales · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransposable elements (TEs) constitute the most common repeated sequences in eukaryotic genomes. Recent studies demonstrated their deep impact on species diversity, adaptation to the environment and diseases. Although there are many conventional bioinformatics algorithms for detecting and classifying TEs, none have achieved reliable results on different types of TEs. Machine learning (ML) techniques can automatically extract hidden patterns and novel information from labeled or non-labeled data and have been applied to solving several scientific problems. METHODOLOGY: We followed the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) process, applying the six stages of the review protocol from it, but added a previous stage, which aims to detect the need for a review. Then search equations were formulated and executed in several literature databases. Relevant publications were scanned and used to extract evidence to answer research questions.

resultsSeveral ML approaches have already been tested on other bioinformatics problems with promising results, yet there are few algorithms and architectures available in literature focused specifically on TEs, despite representing the majority of the nuclear DNA of many organisms. Only 35 articles were found and categorized as relevant in TE or related fields.

conclusionsML is a powerful tool that can be used to address many problems. Although ML techniques have been used widely in other biological tasks, their utilization in TE analyses is still limited. Following the SLR, it was possible to notice that the use of ML for TE analyses (detection and classification) is an open problem, and this new field of research is growing in interest.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsClassificationDeep learningDetectionMachine learningRetrotransposonsTransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID31976169
PMCPMC6967008
OpenAlexW2995727696

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.