Evidence mapPaperPMID 31977076Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2020

The Effect of Orally Administered Dronabinol on Optic Nerve Head Blood Flow in Healthy Subjects-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nikolaus Hommer, Martin Kallab, Stephan Szegedi, Stefan Puchner, Kristina Stjepanek, Martin Bauer, René M Werkmeister, Leopold Schmetterer, Marihan Abensperg-Traun, Gerhard Garhöfer and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Therapeutic Potential of Cannabinoids in Glaucoma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Newer advances in medical management of glaucoma.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Nikolaus HommerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin KallabDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stephan SzegediDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan PuchnerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kristina StjepanekDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin BauerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
René M WerkmeisterCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Leopold SchmettererDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marihan Abensperg-TraunDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard GarhöferDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Doreen SchmidlDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATDuke-NUS Medical School · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that besides its intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering potential, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) may also improve ocular hemodynamics. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether single oral administration of dronabinol, a synthetic THC, alters optic nerve head blood flow (ONHBF) and its regulation in healthy subjects. The study was carried out in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, two-way crossover design in 24 healthy subjects. For each study participant, 2 study days were scheduled, on which they either received capsules containing 5 mg dronabinol or placebo. ONHBF was measured with laser Doppler flowmetry at rest and while the study participants performed isometric exercise for 6 minutes to increase mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). This was repeated 1 hour after drug intake. Ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) was calculated as 2/3MAP-IOP. Dronabinol was well tolerated and no cannabinoid-related psychoactive effects were reported. Neither administration of dronabinol nor placebo had an effect on IOP, MAP, or OPP. In contrast, dronabinol significantly increased ONHBF at rest by 9.5 ± 8.1%, whereas placebo did not show a change in ONHBF (0.3 ± 7.4% vs. baseline, P < 0.001 between study days). Dronabinol did not alter the autoregulatory response of ONHBF to isometric exercise. In conclusion, the present data indicate that low-dose dronabinol increases ONHBF in healthy subjects without affecting IOP, OPP, or inducing psychoactive side effects. In addition, dronabinol does not alter the autoregulatory response of ONHBF to an experimental increase in OPP. Further studies are needed to investigate whether this effect can also be observed in patients with glaucoma.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultBlood PressureCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDronabinolExerciseFemaleHemodynamicsHumansIntraocular PressureLaser-Doppler FlowmetryMaleOptic DiskRegional Blood FlowCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDronabinol

Identifiers

PMID31977076
PMCPMC7325313
OpenAlexW3001331400

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.