Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31980376›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2020

Cellular and molecular basis of liver regeneration.

Sushant Bangru, Auinash Kalsotra

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Conversion of Transplanted Mature Hepatocytes into AfpAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Dynamic activation and dual roles of SOX9Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sushant BangruDepartments of Biochemistry and Pathology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA; Cancer Center@ Illinois, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Auinash KalsotraDepartments of Biochemistry and Pathology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA; Cancer Center@ Illinois, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA; Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA. Electronic address: kalsotra@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Pathogenesis, prognosis, and treatment of NAFLD patientsU01DK061713 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANNA MAE ELIZABETH DIEHL · 2002 to 2026
$10.3M
TNF ALPHA AND RECOVERY FROM ALCOHOLIC LIVER INJURYR01AA010154 · NIAAA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANNA MAE ELIZABETH DIEHL, Auinash Kalsotra · 1994 to 2026
$6.1M
Post-transcriptional mechanisms of gene regulation in cardiac cell growth and developmentR01HL126845 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KALSOTRA, AUINASH · 2015 to 2023
$3.5M
Tissue microenvironment (TIMe) training programT32EB019944 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BHARGAVA, ROHIT, GASKINS, REX · 2016 to 2025
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126845NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA010154NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB019944NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in genetics and genomics have reinvigorated the field of liver regeneration. It is now possible to combine lineage-tracing with genome-wide studies to genetically mark individual liver cells and their progenies and detect precise changes in their genome, transcriptome, and proteome under normal versus regenerative settings. The recent use of single-cell RNA sequencing methodologies in model organisms has, in some ways, transformed our understanding of the cellular and molecular biology of liver regeneration. Here, we review the latest strides in our knowledge of general principles that coordinate regeneration of the liver and reflect on some conflicting evidence and controversies surrounding this topic. We consider the prominent mechanisms that stimulate homeostasis-related vis-à-vis injury-driven regenerative responses, highlight the likely cellular sources/depots that reconstitute the liver following various injuries and discuss the extrinsic and intrinsic signals that direct liver cells to proliferate, de-differentiate, or trans-differentiate while the tissue recovers from acute or chronic damage.

Indexed as

Liver RegenerationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationHumansLiverHepatocellular plasticityLineage-tracingLiver injury and repairSingle-cell RNA sequencingTranscriptional and post-transcriptional gene regulation

Identifiers

PMID31980376
PMCPMC7108750
OpenAlexW3001749946

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.