Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31989419›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2020

Improved Street Walkability, Incivilities, and Esthetics Are Associated with Greater Park Use in Two Low-Income Neighborhoods.

Andrea S Richardson, Madhumita Ghosh-Dastidar, Rebecca L Collins, Gerald P Hunter, Wendy M Troxel, Natalie Colabianchi, Deborah A Cohen, Tamara Dubowitz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Park Proximity and Use for Physical Activity among Urban Residents: Associations with Mental Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea S RichardsonSocial and Economic Wellbeing Division, RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. arichard@rand.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6894-8226
Madhumita Ghosh-DastidarSocial and Economic Wellbeing Division, RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Rebecca L CollinsSocial and Economic Wellbeing Division, RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Gerald P HunterSocial and Economic Wellbeing Division, RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Wendy M TroxelSocial and Economic Wellbeing Division, RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Natalie ColabianchiSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2013, USA.
Deborah A CohenSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2013, USA.
Tamara DubowitzSocial and Economic Wellbeing Division, RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

Funding

Neighborhood Change: Impact on Sleep and Obesity-Related Health DisparitiesR01HL122460 · NHLBI · RAND CORPORATION · PI DUBOWITZ, TAMARA, TROXEL, WENDY M · 2015 to 2018
$3.3M
Impact of Greenspace Improvement on Physical Activity in a Low Income CommunityR01CA164137 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI DUBOWITZ, TAMARA · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164137NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parks may provide opportunities for people to increase their physical activity and improve health. Yet, parks are generally less plentiful and underutilized in low-income urban neighborhoods compared with more advantaged neighborhoods. Renovations within and around parks may improve park utilization but the empirical evidence supporting this relationship is scarce. This study assessed the impact of greenspace, housing, and commercial investments on street characteristics (walkability, amenities, incivilities/poor esthetics) and park use by examining park use over time in two low-income neighborhoods in Pittsburgh, PA (n = 17 parks), before and after neighborhood-based renovations that were primarily centered in one neighborhood. We used systematic observation of parks, park use, and street blocks surrounding parks to examine the impact of neighborhood changes on park use. We used difference-in-differences to test whether park use and street characteristics surrounding the parks improved more in the intervention neighborhood than in the comparison neighborhood. We also used zero-inflated negative binomial regression with interactions by time to test whether changes in street characteristics were associated with changes in park use over time. We found that improved walkability, incivilities, and esthetics surrounding parks in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods were associated with greater park use and may help increase visits to underutilized parks.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCitiesEnvironment DesignExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParks, RecreationalPennsylvaniaPovertyResidence CharacteristicsWalkingNeighborhoodParksPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID31989419
PMCPMC7101449

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.