Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31992582›Full record

ArticleScience signaling2020

Fragile epitopes-Antibody's guess is as good as yours.

Kevin A Janes

Open access · greenAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Science signaling, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Top-down proteomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2024
    Article
  5. Novel Strategies to Address the Challenges in Top-Down Proteomics.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin A JanesDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. Email: kjanes@virginia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8028-6138
University of Virginia · US

Funding

An Integrated Systems Approach for Incompletely Penetrant Onco-phenotypes.U01CA215794 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI JANES, KEVIN A · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
(PQB4) Stochastic Profiling of Functional Single-Cell States Within Solid TumorsR01CA194470 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI JANES, KEVIN A · 2015 to 2018
$1.8M
Heterogeneous Loss of GDF11 Tumor Suppression in Triple-negative Breast CancerR01CA214718 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI JANES, KEVIN A · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Interdisciplinary Training in Systems & Biomolecular Data ScienceT32GM145443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Kevin A Janes, Jason Papin · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194470NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214718NCI NIH HHS U01 CA215794NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies recognize epitopes so specifically that altering a single residue can disrupt binding. In this issue of

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalEpitopesAnimalsAntibody AffinityAntibody SpecificityHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID31992582
PMCPMC7231929
OpenAlexW3003157002

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.