Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31997145›Full record

ReviewCardiology and therapy2020

The Beneficial Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Barbara Bellmann, Tina Lin, Kathrin Greissinger, Laura Rottner, Andreas Rillig, Sabine Zimmerling

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Validity and Reproducibility of the Six-Minute Stepper Test in Cardiac Patients.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Gender differences in cardiac rehabilitation participation and outcomes: an 18-year retrospective study in Iran.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara BellmannMEDIAN AGZ Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. barbara.bellmann@median-kliniken.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-9376
Tina LinGenesisCare, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kathrin GreissingerMEDIAN AGZ Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Laura RottnerUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas RilligUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sabine ZimmerlingMEDIAN AGZ Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society · AURobert Schumann University of Music and Media · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a combined range of measures aimed at providing patients with cardiovascular disease with the optimum psychological and physical conditions so that they themselves can prevent their disease from progressing or potentially reversing its course. The following measures are the three main parts of CR: exercise training, lifestyle modification, and psychological intervention. The course of cardiac rehabilitation generally takes 3-4 weeks.

Indexed as

After careAtrial fibrillationCardiac rehabilitationCardiologyExercise trainingLifestyle modificationMyocardial infarctionPsychological intervention

Identifiers

PMID31997145
PMCPMC7237601
OpenAlexW3003274735

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.