ArticleInsights into imaging2020
Macrocyclic MR contrast agents: evaluation of multiple-organ gadolinium retention in healthy rats.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- EPR-based Assessment of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent Retention and Gadolinium Transchelation in Inflamed Murine Brain.Investigative radiology · 2026Article
- Glycan-Induced Transchelation of Gadolinium from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent-Complexes.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Gadoteric Acid and Gadolinium: Exploring Short- and Long-Term Effects on Healthy Animals.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- Gadolinium Contrast Agent Deposition in Children.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Toxicity Mechanisms of Gadolinium and Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Ten years of gadolinium retention and deposition: ESMRMB-GREC looks backward and forward.European radiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Gadolinium retention in a rat model of subtotal renal failure: are there differences among macrocyclic GBCAs?European radiology experimental · 2023Article
- Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease after the Use of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: A Review for the Cardiovascular Imager.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Gadolinium: pharmacokinetics and toxicity in humans and laboratory animals following contrast agent administration.Archives of toxicology · 2022Review
- Unlabeled aspirin as an activatable theranostic MRI agent for breast cancer.Theranostics · 2022Article
- How the Chemical Properties of GBCAs Influence Their Safety Profiles In Vivo.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Gadolinium Clearance in the First 5 Weeks After Repeated Intravenous Administration of Gadoteridol, Gadoterate Meglumine, and Gadobutrol to rats.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2021Article
- The TRUTH confirmed: validation of an intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol and gadoteridol for imaging of glioblastoma using quantitative enhancement analysis.European radiology experimental · 2021Article
- Safety and diagnostic efficacy of gadoteridol for magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine in children 2 years of age and younger.Pediatric radiology · 2021Article
- Repeat and single dose administration of gadodiamide to rats to investigate concentration and location of gadolinium and the cell ultrastructure.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare Gd levels in rat tissues after cumulative exposure to four commercially available macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).
methodsSixty-five male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to four exposure groups (n = 15 per group) and one control group (n = 5). Animals in each exposure group received 20 GBCA administrations (four per week of ProHance®, Dotarem®, Clariscan™, or Gadovist® for 5 consecutive weeks) at a dose of 0.6 mmol/kg bodyweight. After 28-days' recovery, animals were sacrificed and tissues harvested for Gd determination by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS). Histologic assessment of the kidney tissue was performed for all animals.
resultsSignificantly (p ≤ 0.005; all evaluations) lower Gd levels were noted with ProHance® than with Dotarem®, Clariscan™, or Gadovist® in all soft tissue organs: 0.144 ± 0.015 nmol/g vs. 0.342 ± 0.045, 0.377 ± 0.042, and 0.292 ± 0.047 nmol/g, respectively, for cerebrum; 0.151 ± 0.039 nmol/g vs. 0.315 ± 0.04, 0.345 ± 0.053, and 0.316 ± 0.040 nmol/g, respectively, for cerebellum; 0.361 ± 0.106 nmol/g vs. 0.685 ± 0.330, 0.823 ± 0.495, and 1.224 ± 0.664 nmol/g, respectively, for liver; 38.6 ± 25.0 nmol/g vs. 172 ± 134, 212 ± 121, and 294 ± 127 nmol/g, respectively, for kidney; and 0.400 ± 0.112 nmol/g vs. 0.660 ± 0.202, 0.688 ± 0.215, and 0.999 ± 0.442 nmol/g, respectively, for skin. No GBCA-induced macroscopic or microscopic findings were noted in the kidneys.
conclusionsLess Gd is retained in the brain and body tissues of rats 28 days after the last exposure to ProHance® compared to other macrocyclic GBCAs, likely due to unique physico-chemical features that facilitate more rapid and efficient clearance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.