Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32020385›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2020

Macrocyclic MR contrast agents: evaluation of multiple-organ gadolinium retention in healthy rats.

Simona Bussi, Alessandra Coppo, Roberto Celeste, Antonello Fanizzi, Alberto Fringuello Mingo, Andrea Ferraris, Catherine Botteron, Miles A Kirchin, Fabio Tedoldi, Federico Maisano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gadolinium Contrast Agent Deposition in Children.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simona BussiBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Via Ribes 5, 10010, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy. simona.bussi@bracco.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6619-0404
Alessandra CoppoBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Via Ribes 5, 10010, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Roberto CelesteBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Via Ribes 5, 10010, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Antonello FanizziBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Via Ribes 5, 10010, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Alberto Fringuello MingoBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Via Ribes 5, 10010, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Andrea FerrarisBracco SpA, Via Caduti di Marcinelle 13, 20134, Milano, Italy.
Catherine BotteronSirius Pathology, 1705 route du Salève, 74350, Cruseilles, France.
Miles A KirchinBracco Imaging SpA, Via Caduti di Marcinelle 13, 20134, Milano, Italy.
Fabio TedoldiBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Via Ribes 5, 10010, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Federico MaisanoBracco SpA, Via Caduti di Marcinelle 13, 20134, Milano, Italy.
Bracco (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare Gd levels in rat tissues after cumulative exposure to four commercially available macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs).

methodsSixty-five male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to four exposure groups (n = 15 per group) and one control group (n = 5). Animals in each exposure group received 20 GBCA administrations (four per week of ProHance®, Dotarem®, Clariscan™, or Gadovist® for 5 consecutive weeks) at a dose of 0.6 mmol/kg bodyweight. After 28-days' recovery, animals were sacrificed and tissues harvested for Gd determination by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS). Histologic assessment of the kidney tissue was performed for all animals.

resultsSignificantly (p ≤ 0.005; all evaluations) lower Gd levels were noted with ProHance® than with Dotarem®, Clariscan™, or Gadovist® in all soft tissue organs: 0.144 ± 0.015 nmol/g vs. 0.342 ± 0.045, 0.377 ± 0.042, and 0.292 ± 0.047 nmol/g, respectively, for cerebrum; 0.151 ± 0.039 nmol/g vs. 0.315 ± 0.04, 0.345 ± 0.053, and 0.316 ± 0.040 nmol/g, respectively, for cerebellum; 0.361 ± 0.106 nmol/g vs. 0.685 ± 0.330, 0.823 ± 0.495, and 1.224 ± 0.664 nmol/g, respectively, for liver; 38.6 ± 25.0 nmol/g vs. 172 ± 134, 212 ± 121, and 294 ± 127 nmol/g, respectively, for kidney; and 0.400 ± 0.112 nmol/g vs. 0.660 ± 0.202, 0.688 ± 0.215, and 0.999 ± 0.442 nmol/g, respectively, for skin. No GBCA-induced macroscopic or microscopic findings were noted in the kidneys.

conclusionsLess Gd is retained in the brain and body tissues of rats 28 days after the last exposure to ProHance® compared to other macrocyclic GBCAs, likely due to unique physico-chemical features that facilitate more rapid and efficient clearance.

Indexed as

Contrast mediaGadoliniumHistologyMagnetic resonance imagingPharmacokineticsRats

Identifiers

PMID32020385
PMCPMC7000570
OpenAlexW3010851348

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.