Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32021321›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2020

Eradication Treatment of

Chun Gao, Shi-Yu Du, Long Fang, Yan-Hua Fan, Ai-Ping Song, Huang Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analysis ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Success of susceptibility-guided eradication ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  5. Molecular tools of antibiotic resistance forFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Primary Antibiotic Resistance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect and Safety ofInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chun GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing 100029, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3477-5886
Shi-Yu DuDepartment of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing 100029, People's Republic of China.
Long FangDepartment of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing 100029, People's Republic of China.
Yan-Hua FanDepartment of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing 100029, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6638-7522
Ai-Ping SongDepartment of Pathology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing 100029, People's Republic of China.
Huang ChenDepartment of Pathology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing 100029, People's Republic of China.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnfortunately, the eradication rate of

methods261 patients were analyzed retrospectively, including 111 patients who were treated for the first time (one group as First-treated) and 150 patients who failed at least once in bismuth quadruple therapy (another group as Re-treatment). Antibiotic resistance was examined by Real-time PCR detection and conventional PCR and sequencing method. The eradication rate (ER) was compared per intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) between the two groups.

resultsThe resistance rates to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, fluoroquinolone and tetracycline were 5.5%, 42.1%, 41.7% and 12.9% in the 111 first-treated patients, and 11.7%, 79.7%, 70.7% and 30.0% in the 150 re-treatment patients. The ERs in the ITT and PP analyses were 92.79% (95% CI, 87.98-97.60%, n=111) and 98.10% (95% CI, 95.48-100%, n=105), respectively, in the first-treated patients and 90.67% (95% CI, 86.01-95.32%, n=150) and 95.10% (95% CI, 91.57-98.64%, n=143), respectively, in the re-treatment patients. No significant differences were shown in the ERs between two group patients, and no serious adverse events were found.

conclusion

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceeradicationfirst treatmentHelicobacter pylorimolecular pathologyre-treatment

Identifiers

PMID32021321
PMCPMC6954831
OpenAlexW2997158003

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.