Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022290›Full record

SynthesisDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2020

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in children and adults with type 1 diabetes.

K Winkley, R Upsher, D Stahl, D Pollard, A Brennan, S Heller, K Ismail

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Psychotherapeutic Interventions to Improve Psychological Adjustment in Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Do baseline resilience profiles moderate the effects of a resilience-enhancing intervention for adolescents with type I diabetes?Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Systematic Literature Review of Psychological Interventions for Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Editorial: Psychological Interventions to Improve Diabetes Self-Management.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K WinkleyFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-6040
R UpsherDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0881-8654
D StahlDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7987-6619
D PollardSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5630-0115
A BrennanSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1025-312X
S HellerDepartment of Oncology & Metabolism, University of Sheffield School of Medicine, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2425-9565
K IsmailDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-449X
University of Sheffield · GBFlorence Nightingale Foundation · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/14/213/10Health Technology Assessment Programme 12/213/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe conducted a systematic review aggregate and network meta-analysis of psychological interventions for people with type 1 diabetes to assess their effectiveness in improving glycaemic levels.

methodsWe searched the following databases from 1 January 2003 to 1 July 2018: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, Dissertation Abstract International. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) of psychological interventions for children and adults with type 1 diabetes reported in any language. We extracted data on publications, participant characteristics at baseline, intervention and control group, and data for the primary outcome, change in glycaemic control [HbA

resultsTwenty-four adult RCTs and 23 of children with type 1 diabetes were included in the systematic review. In aggregate meta-analysis there was no overall effect of psychological intervention compared with control on HbA

conclusionsOverall psychological interventions for children and adults with type 1 diabetes do not improve glycaemic control. For adults, CBT-based interventions have the potential to be effective.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyCounselingFamily TherapyAdultChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Glycated HemoglobinGlycemic ControlHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32022290
PMCPMC7217004
OpenAlexW3004722801

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.