Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024849›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A deep learning system accurately classifies primary and metastatic cancers using passenger mutation patterns.

Wei Jiao, Gurnit Atwal, Paz Polak, Rosa Karlic, Edwin Cuppen, PCAWG Tumor Subtypes and Clinical Translation Working Group, Alexandra Danyi, Jeroen de Ridder, Carla van Herpen, Martijn P Lolkema and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 112 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 20 institutions in 36 countries.

Wei Jiao *Computational Biology Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gurnit Atwal *Computational Biology Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-3117
Paz Polak *Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2153-4488
Rosa KarlicBioinformatics Group, Division of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Horvatovac 102a, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1291-2897
Edwin CuppenHartwig Medical Foundation, Science Park 408, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PCAWG Tumor Subtypes and Clinical Translation Working Group
Alexandra DanyiCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeroen de RidderCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-3477
Carla van HerpenRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Martijn P LolkemaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0466-2928
Neeltje SteeghsDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gad GetzBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0936-0753
Quaid D MorrisVector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2760-6999
Lincoln D SteinComputational Biology Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada. lincoln.stein@gmail.com.
PCAWG Consortium
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research · CABroad Institute · USGerman Cancer Research Center · DEWellcome Sanger Institute · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USThe University of Sydney · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBGI Group (China) · CNUniversity of Cambridge · GBMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBThe University of Queensland · AUCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre · CAThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESNational Institutes of Health · USJames S. McDonnell Foundation · USRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Toronto · CAGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Strategies to Overcome Immune Resistance in Head and Neck CancersP01CA240239 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PAI, SARA ISABEL · 2019 to 2023
$8.4M
Cancer Research UK 22932Cancer Research UK 23433Cancer Research UK 23916Cancer Research UK 23924Cancer Research UK 27815NCI NIH HHS P01 CA240239NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cancer, the primary tumour's organ of origin and histopathology are the strongest determinants of its clinical behaviour, but in 3% of cases a patient presents with a metastatic tumour and no obvious primary. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, we train a deep learning classifier to predict cancer type based on patterns of somatic passenger mutations detected in whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 2606 tumours representing 24 common cancer types produced by the PCAWG Consortium. Our classifier achieves an accuracy of 91% on held-out tumor samples and 88% and 83% respectively on independent primary and metastatic samples, roughly double the accuracy of trained pathologists when presented with a metastatic tumour without knowledge of the primary. Surprisingly, adding information on driver mutations reduced accuracy. Our results have clinical applicability, underscore how patterns of somatic passenger mutations encode the state of the cell of origin, and can inform future strategies to detect the source of circulating tumour DNA.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMutationComputational BiologyFemaleGenome, HumanHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32024849
PMCPMC7002586
OpenAlexW3005188734

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.