ArticleNature2020
Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes.
Article in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 554 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
554 citing papers in PubMed, 963 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-cell epigenomics of colorectal cancer.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Chromosomal instability in cancer: sources, consequences and new therapeutic opportunities.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- The BRCA1 coiled-coil domain is dispensable for suppression of tandem duplications and tolerance of FANCM loss.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Improving Long-Read Somatic Structural Variant Calling with Pangenome and De Novo Personal Genome Assembly.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Loss of CYLD on Chromosome 16q Impairs Homologous Recombination and Genomic Stability Through TIRR Degradation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Ionizing Radiation and Ultraviolet Light Irradiation-Associated DNA Damage Increasing Genomic Instability Risk.Cancer science · 2026Review
- LINE-1 insertion intermediates recombine with one another or with DNA breaks to form genome rearrangements.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Long-read sequencing of single cell-derived melanoma sublines reveals divergent and parallel genomic and epigenomic evolutionary trajectories.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Invas: an inversion-aware method for transcriptome assembly.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Clustering of inverted triplications in centromeric and subtelomeric chromosomal regions ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- NeoCircle: pre- and post-operative circulating tumor DNA dynamics predicts survival in neoadjuvant-treated early breast cancer.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Promoter reinforcement supports transcriptional resilience in drug-resistant cancer.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026Article
- 53BP1-independent Shieldin-BRCA1 antagonism at replication-coupled double-strand breaks.Nature communications · 2026Article
- From fragments to full pictures: how long-read sequencing platforms are revolutionizing oncology research.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Tumor Whole-Genome Sequencing for Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Metastasized Solid Cancer.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026Article
- Patterns and drivers of 43,617 mosaic chromosomal alterations in blood.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Robust discovery of mutational signatures using power posteriors.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
494 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors at 20 institutions in 33 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A key mutational process in cancer is structural variation, in which rearrangements delete, amplify or reorder genomic segments that range in size from kilobases to whole chromosomes
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.