ArticleNature2020
The era of massive cancer sequencing projects has reached a turning point.
Article in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Priorities to Promote Participant Engagement in the Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS) Network.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023Article
- Promoting patient engagement in cancer genomics research programs: An environmental scan.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Defining cancer growth beyond the mitotic index.Nature cell biology · 2022Article
- Pan-Cancer Analyses Reveal Oncogenic and Immunological Role of PLOD2.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Constructing germline research cohorts from the discarded reads of clinical tumor sequences.Genome medicine · 2021Article
- Use of signals of positive and negative selection to distinguish cancer genes and passenger genes.eLife · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32025026What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.