Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32034097›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

In situ genetic engineering of tumors for long-lasting and systemic immunotherapy.

Stephany Y Tzeng, Kisha K Patel, David R Wilson, Randall A Meyer, Kelly R Rhodes, Jordan J Green

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeted nanodelivery systems for personalized cancer therapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nucleic acid and oligonucleotide delivery for activating innate immunity in cancer immunotherapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephany Y TzengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Kisha K PatelDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218.
David R WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Randall A MeyerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Kelly R RhodesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Jordan J GreenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218; green@jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USBloomberg (United States) · US

Funding

TR&D Project 3P41EB028239 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jordan Green, JONATHAN P SCHNECK · 2019 to 2026
$11.5M
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007057 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KANOLD, PATRICK O, KARCHIN, RACHEL · 1985 to 2023
$10.4M
Gene Delivery Nanoparticles to Treat GlioblastomaR01CA228133 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, JORDAN · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228133NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028239NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy has been the subject of extensive research, but highly effective and broadly applicable methods remain elusive. Moreover, a general approach to engender endogenous patient-specific cellular therapy, without the need for a priori knowledge of tumor antigen, ex vivo cellular manipulation, or cellular manufacture, could dramatically reduce costs and broaden accessibility. Here, we describe a biotechnology based on synthetic, biodegradable nanoparticles that can genetically reprogram cancer cells and their microenvironment in situ so that the cancer cells can act as tumor-associated antigen-presenting cells (tAPCs) by inducing coexpression of a costimulatory molecule (4-1BBL) and immunostimulatory cytokine (IL-12). In B16-F10 melanoma and MC38 colorectal carcinoma mouse models, reprogramming nanoparticles in combination with checkpoint blockade significantly reduced tumor growth over time and, in some cases, cleared the tumor, leading to long-term survivors that were then resistant to the formation of new tumors upon rechallenge at a distant site. In vitro and in vivo analyses confirmed that locally delivered tAPC-reprogramming nanoparticles led to a significant cell-mediated cytotoxic immune response with systemic effects. The systemic tumor-specific and cell-mediated immunotherapy response was achieved without requiring a priori knowledge of tumor-expressed antigens and reflects the translational potential of this nanomedicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleGenes, ReporterGenetic EngineeringHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanomedicineNeoplasms, ExperimentalT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsImmunologic Factorscancergene deliveryimmunotherapynanoparticlesnonviral

Identifiers

PMID32034097
PMCPMC7049107
OpenAlexW3005106351

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.