Evidence mapPaperPMID 32037653Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2020

Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes of linagliptin treatment in older people with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease and/or kidney disease: A prespecified subgroup analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled CARMELINA® trial.

Mark E Cooper, Julio Rosenstock, Takashi Kadowaki, Yutaka Seino, Christoph Wanner, Sven Schnaidt, Douglas Clark, Odd Erik Johansen, CARMELINA investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Mark E CooperDepartment of Diabetes, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Julio RosenstockDallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8324-3275
Takashi KadowakiDepartment of Prevention of Diabetes and Lifestyle-related Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka SeinoKansai Electric Power Medical Research Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1099-7989
Christoph WannerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Würzburg University Clinic, Würzburg, Germany.
Sven SchnaidtBoehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Biberach, Germany.
Douglas ClarkBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
Odd Erik JohansenBoehringer Ingelheim Norway KS, Asker, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-0530
CARMELINA investigators
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Norway) · NODallas Diabetes Research Center · USKansai Electric Power (Japan) · JPMonash University · AUTokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences · JPUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim & Eli Lilly and Company Diabetes Alliance
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIn CARMELINA®, linagliptin demonstrated cardiovascular and renal safety in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with high renal and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. We investigated safety and efficacy of this dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor in older participants. MATERIALS AND

methodsSubjects aged ≥18 years with T2D and established CVD with urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) >30 mg/g, and/or prevalent kidney disease, were randomized to linagliptin or placebo added to usual care. The primary endpoint (time to first occurrence of 3P-MACE: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke) and other outcomes were evaluated across age groups <65 (n = 2968), 65 to <75 (n = 2800) and ≥75 years (n = 1211).

resultsMean age was 65.9 years (17.4% and 5.9% aged ≥75 and 80, respectively) and median follow-up was 2.2 years. The hazard ratio (HR) for 3P-MACE with linagliptin versus placebo was 1.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89, 1.17] with no significant interaction between age and treatment effect (P = 0.0937). HRs for participants aged <65, 65 to <75 and ≥75 years were 1.11 (95% CI 0.89, 1.40), 1.09 (0.89, 1.33) and 0.76 (0.57, 1.02), respectively. Linagliptin did not increase the risk of adverse kidney outcomes or hospitalization for heart failure across age groups. The incidence of adverse events, including hypoglycaemia, increased with age but was similar with linagliptin and placebo despite glycated haemoglobin A1c reduction with linagliptin.

conclusionsLinagliptin did not increase risk for cardiovascular events or hypoglycaemia and kidney function remained stable in older people with T2D and established CVD with albuminuria and/or kidney disease.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsKidney DiseasesAdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsKidneyLinagliptinTreatment OutcomeDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsLinagliptin

Identifiers

PMID32037653
PMCPMC7317902
OpenAlexW3005025016

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.