Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040956›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The effect of adjuvant oral application of honey in the management of postoperative pain after tonsillectomy in adults: A pilot study.

Katharina Geißler, Margaretha Schulze, Johanna Inhestern, Winfried Meißner, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Honey as a Natural Antimicrobial.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Dietary supplements and bleeding.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharina GeißlerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4271-5878
Margaretha SchulzeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Johanna InhesternDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Winfried MeißnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Orlando Guntinas-LichiusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the effect of adjuvant oral application of honey for treating postoperative pain after tonsillectomy.

designSingle centre prospective cohort study.

settingTwo cohorts of patients after tonsillectomy.

participants56 patients treated with honey 8 times per day (honey group), 18 patients treated without honey (control group); baseline analgesia were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) or coxibs; opioids were used as pro re nata (PRN) medication; mean age 34.4 ± 13.4 years; 36% women.

main outcome measuresOn first to fifth postoperative day, patients rated their pain using the validated questionnaire of the German-wide project Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Treatment (QUIPS) including a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10) for determination of patient's pain. QUIPS allows standardized assessment of patients' characteristics andpain-associated patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The influence of preoperative and postoperative parameters on patients' postoperative pain were estimated by univariate and multivariate statistical analysis.

resultsAverage pain in activity in the control group was greater than 4 (NRS 4.4 ± 2.4) during the first five postoperative days, with a renewed increase in pain intensity on the fifth day (4.3 ± 2.5). In the honey group, the pain in activity decreased without any further pain increase and was only higher than 4 on the first three postoperative days (4.3 ± 2.1, all p>0.05). However; neither minimal nor maximal pain were significantly different between both groups on the first postoperative day (p = 0.217, p = 0.980). Over the five postoperative days, the minimal and maximal pain in the honey group decreased continuously and faster than in the control group. With regard to pain-related impairments on the first day, the honey group reported less pain-related sleep disturbance (p = 0.026), as well as significantly fewer episodes of postoperative oral bleeding (p = 0.028) than the control group. Patients without honey consumption had on the first and fifth postoperative day a higher risk of increased minimal pain (OR = -2.424, CI = -4.075 --0.385). Gender was an independent factor for compliance of honey consumption on the second postoperative day (p = 0.037). Men had a lower probability for compliance of honey consumption (OR = -0.288, CI = -2.863 --0.090).

conclusionThere was a trend of reduced postoperative pain after oral honey application. Honey also seems to reduce pain-related impairments. The need for additional opioids on the first day could be reduced. A larger controlled trial is now needed to varify the effect of honey on pain after tonsillectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00006153. The authors confirm that all ongoing and related trials for this drug/intervention are registered.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, PharmaceuticHoneyAdministration, OralAdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsPostoperative PainPostoperative PeriodAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID32040956
PMCPMC7010464
OpenAlexW3006630734

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.