Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32045995›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Pancreatic Fibrosis and Chronic Pancreatitis: Mini-Review of Non-Histologic Diagnosis for Clinical Applications.

Chung-Tsui Huang, Cheng-Kuan Lin, Tzong-Hsi Lee, Yao-Jen Liang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inhibition of hedgehog signaling ameliorates severity of chronic pancreatitis in experimental mouse models.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Radiology of fibrosis part II: abdominal organs.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chung-Tsui HuangDivision gastroenterology, Department of internal medicine, Far-Eastern memorial hospital, No.21, Sec. 2, Nanya S. Rd., Banciao Dist., New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.
Cheng-Kuan LinDivision gastroenterology, Department of internal medicine, Far-Eastern memorial hospital, No.21, Sec. 2, Nanya S. Rd., Banciao Dist., New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.
Tzong-Hsi LeeDivision gastroenterology, Department of internal medicine, Far-Eastern memorial hospital, No.21, Sec. 2, Nanya S. Rd., Banciao Dist., New Taipei City 220, Taiwan.
Yao-Jen LiangGraduate institute of applied science and engineering, College of science and engineering, No.510, Zhongzheng Rd., Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic fibrosis is the dominant reversible pathological change and diagnostic factor in early chronic pancreatitis, defined by a mechanistic approach proposed in 2016. Main guidelines for chronic pancreatitis were published by the American Pancreas Association in 2014, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology in 2015, and United European Gastroenterology in 2017. All three sets of guidelines mentioned that the staging of chronic pancreatitis is important but challenging. There are various image modalities for the non-histologic diagnosis of pancreatic fibrosis: (1) shear wave elastography, such as an acoustic radiation force impulse with a cut-off value of 1.4 m/s; (2) strain elastography using grades of strain; (3) endoscopic ultrasonography using the Rosemont criteria or endoscopic ultrasound criteria for early chronic pancreatitis proposed by the Japan Pancreas Society; (4) computed tomography using the Hounsfield scale or number of micro-calcifications; and (5) magnetic resonance imaging using the apparent diffusion coefficient and the T1w flash and T2w HASTE sequences. The clinical applications are to (1) evaluate pancreatic tumors and inflammatory disease; (2) monitor dyspepsia with early chronic pancreatitis; (3) monitor individuals with a high risk of pancreatic cancer; (4) analyze a fatty pancreas with fibrosis; (5) predict a fistula after pancreatic surgery; and (6) predict outcomes for chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer. The selection of tools will be dependent on the clinical scenario. Conclusion: There are various modalities for the non-histologic diagnosis of pancreatic fibrosis. The selection of the optimal device will be dependent on the clinical scenario.

Indexed as

early chronic pancreatitisnon-histologic diagnosispancreatic fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID32045995
PMCPMC7168241

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.