Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068869›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2020

Synonymous Site-to-Site Substitution Rate Variation Dramatically Inflates False Positive Rates of Selection Analyses: Ignore at Your Own Peril.

Sadie R Wisotsky, Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond, Stephen D Shank, Spencer V Muse

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MoleRate: comparing molecular relative evolutionary rates to detect convergent evolution.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Analysis ofmSphere · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sadie R WisotskyBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Sergei L Kosakovsky PondInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Stephen D ShankInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Spencer V MuseBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina State University · USTemple University · US

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN BIOINFORMATICST32ES007329 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Fred A. Wright · 2000 to 2026
$6.8M
Turning big data analysis infrastructure for HIV researchR01AI134384 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI NEKRUTENKO, ANTON, POND, SERGEI L KOSAKOVSKY · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
HyPhy: Molecular Evolutionary AnalysesR01GM093939 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MUSE, SPENCER V., POND, SERGEI L KOSAKOVSKY · 2010 to 2018
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI134384NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007329NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most molecular evolutionary studies of natural selection maintain the decades-old assumption that synonymous substitution rate variation (SRV) across sites within genes occurs at levels that are either nonexistent or negligible. However, numerous studies challenge this assumption from a biological perspective and show that SRV is comparable in magnitude to that of nonsynonymous substitution rate variation. We evaluated the impact of this assumption on methods for inferring selection at the molecular level by incorporating SRV into an existing method (BUSTED) for detecting signatures of episodic diversifying selection in genes. Using simulated data we found that failing to account for even moderate levels of SRV in selection testing is likely to produce intolerably high false positive rates. To evaluate the effect of the SRV assumption on actual inferences we compared results of tests with and without the assumption in an empirical analysis of over 13,000 Euteleostomi (bony vertebrate) gene alignments from the Selectome database. This exercise reveals that close to 50% of positive results (i.e., evidence for selection) in empirical analyses disappear when SRV is modeled as part of the statistical analysis and are thus candidates for being false positives. The results from this work add to a growing literature establishing that tests of selection are much more sensitive to certain model assumptions than previously believed.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSelection, GeneticSilent MutationAnimalsPhylogenyRhodopsinVertebratesRhodopsincodon modelepisodic selectionevolutionary modelsynonymous rate variation

Identifiers

PMID32068869
PMCPMC7403620
OpenAlexW3008085605

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.