Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068978›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2020

Impact of diabetes on clinical outcome of patients with heart failure undergoing ICD and CRT procedures: results from the German Device Registry.

Elif Kaya, Jochen Senges, Matthias Hochadel, Lars Eckardt, Dietrich Andresen, Hüseyin Ince, Stefan G Spitzer, Thomas Kleemann, Sebastian S K Maier, Werner Jung and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Elif KayaDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jochen SengesStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen an der Universität Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Matthias HochadelStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen an der Universität Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Lars EckardtDepartment of Cardiology II - Electrophysiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Dietrich AndresenKlinik für Kardiologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hubertus, Berlin, Germany.
Hüseyin InceDepartment of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan G SpitzerPraxisklinik Herz und Gefäße Dresden and Brandenburg, Institut of Medical Technology, University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Thomas KleemannDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Sebastian S K MaierDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Straubing, Straubing, Germany.
Werner JungDepartment of Cardiology, Academic Hospital Villingen, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Christoph StellbrinkDepartment of Cardiology, Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Tienush RassafDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Reza WakiliDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DEStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung · DEBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEFranziskus-Krankenhaus Berlin · DEKlinikum Bielefeld · DEKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DENephrologisches Zentrum Villingen-Schwenningen · DEStadtwerke Straubing (Germany) · DEUniversity of Münster · DEVivantes Klinikum · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 394433254European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 633193" [CATCH ME]foundation Stiftung Institut for Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen, GermanyGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research 81X1600203, 81X1600204, 81X2600216, 81X2600232, 81X2600234Registry from Medtronic, Biotronik and St. Jude Medical
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDiabetes mellitus (DM) has a negative impact on prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). The role impact of DM in HF patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices might differ and remains unclear. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of DM on periprocedural complications and clinical outcome in HF patients undergoing ICD or CRT implantation. METHODS AND

resultsWithin the German Device Registry, data from 50 German centres were collected between January 2007 and February 2014. A retrospective analysis of n = 5329 patients undergoing ICD implantation was conducted. Patients' characteristics, procedural data, periprocedural complications, and post-procedural clinical outcome, including a composite clinical endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MACCE), were analysed. Subgroup analysis were performed for ICD and CRT implantations. Median follow-up was 15.7 (12.9; 20.0) and 16.2 (12.8; 21.2) months in DM and non-DM patients. Of 5329 patients enrolled, n = 1448 (27.2%) had a diagnosis of DM. Within the cohort, 94% of DM and 90% of non-DM patients had a diagnosis of HF. Patients with DM were older, had higher body mass index, and higher rate of cardiovascular comorbidities compared with non-DM patients. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses revealed similar all-over intrahospital periprocedural complication rates in both groups (4.1% vs 3.9%). Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed higher all-cause mortality after 1 year (9.0% vs 6.3%; log-rank P = 0.001) with higher MACCE rates (10.0% vs 7.3%; P < 0.001) in the DM group versus non-DM patients. After multivariable adjustment for relevant covariates, the association of DM to MACCE disappeared [HR 1.11 (0.89-1.38)]. Because chronic kidney disease (CKD) was clearly associated with increased 1 year MACCE after multivariate adjustment [odds ratio (OR) 2.11 (1.68-2.64)], a subgroup analysis was performed showing a strong trend towards more perioperative complications in DM patients with CKD [OR 2.16 (0.9-5.21)], while no effect of DM was observed in patients without CKD [OR 0.73 (0.42-1.28)].

conclusionsThe overall risk of periprocedural complications and short-term (1 year) clinical outcome in patients with DM and HF undergoing ICD or CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation was not increased. In contrast, CKD was associated with an increased risk of 1 year MACCE in HF patients undergoing ICD/CRT-D implantation.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyDefibrillators, ImplantableDiabetes MellitusHeart FailureHumansProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesCardiac resynchronization therapyChronic kidney diseaseComplicationDiabetes mellitusHeart failureImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorOutcomeRegistry

Identifiers

PMID32068978
PMCPMC7261544
OpenAlexW3008787299

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.