Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32079293›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2020

Kernel Differential Subgraph Analysis to Reveal the Key Period Affecting Glioblastoma.

Jiang Xie, Jiamin Sun, Jiatai Feng, Fuzhang Yang, Jiao Wang, Tieqiao Wen, Qing Nie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiang XieSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, NanChen Road 333, Shanghai 200444, China.
Jiamin SunSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, NanChen Road 333, Shanghai 200444, China.
Jiatai FengSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, NanChen Road 333, Shanghai 200444, China.
Fuzhang YangSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, NanChen Road 333, Shanghai 200444, China.
Jiao WangLaboratory of Molecular Neural Biology, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Nanchen Road 333, Shanghai 200444, China.
Tieqiao WenLaboratory of Molecular Neural Biology, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Nanchen Road 333, Shanghai 200444, China.
Qing NieDepartment of Mathematics, the Center for Mathematical and Computational Biology, and the Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Shanghai University · CNUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Shared Resource Core: Single Cell AnalysisU54CA217378 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LANDER, ARTHUR D · 2018 to 2022
$9.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a fast-growing type of malignant primary brain tumor. To explore the mechanisms in GBM, complex biological networks are used to reveal crucial changes among different biological states, which reflect on the development of living organisms. It is critical to discover the kernel differential subgraph (KDS) that leads to drastic changes. However, identifying the KDS is similar to the Steiner Tree problem that is an NP-hard problem. In this paper, we developed a criterion to explore the KDS (CKDS), which considered the connectivity and scale of KDS, the topological difference of nodes and function relevance between genes in the KDS. The CKDS algorithm was applied to simulated datasets and three single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets including GBM, fetal human cortical neurons (FHCN) and neural differentiation. Then we performed the network topology and functional enrichment analyses on the extracted KDSs. Compared with the state-of-art methods, the CKDS algorithm outperformed on simulated datasets to discover the KDSs. In the GBM and FHCN, seventeen genes (one biomarker, nine regulatory genes, one driver genes, six therapeutic targets) and KEGG pathways in KDSs were strongly supported by literature mining that they were highly interrelated with GBM. Moreover, focused on GBM, there were fifteen genes (including ten regulatory genes, three driver genes, one biomarkers, one therapeutic target) and KEGG pathways found in the KDS of neural differentiation process from activated neural stem cells (aNSC) to neural progenitor cells (NPC), while few genes and no pathway were found in the period from NPC to astrocytes (Ast). These experiments indicated that the process from aNSC to NPC is a key differentiation period affecting the development of GBM. Therefore, the CKDS algorithm provides a unique perspective in identifying cell-type-specific genes and KDSs.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsComputer SimulationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsGlioblastomaHumansModels, GeneticTranscriptomecomplex networksglioblastomakernel differential subgraphscRNA-seqsingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID32079293
PMCPMC7072688
OpenAlexW3005558958

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.