Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32079541›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2020

A framework for transcriptome-wide association studies in breast cancer in diverse study populations.

Arjun Bhattacharya, Montserrat García-Closas, Andrew F Olshan, Charles M Perou, Melissa A Troester, Michael I Love

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multiancestry Transcriptome-Wide Association Study Identifies Candidate Genes Associated with Hepatoblastoma.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arjun BhattacharyaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Montserrat García-ClosasDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA.
Andrew F OlshanDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Charles M PerouLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Melissa A TroesterDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Michael I LoveDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. milove@email.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8401-0545
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BENJAMIN CARLISLE CALHOUN · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Hazel B Nichols · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Reproduction, Lactation and Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer SubtypesP01CA151135 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI AMBROSONE, CHRISTINE B., OLSHAN, ANDREW · 2011 to 2017
$18.1M
A Modular Framework for Accurate, Interpretable, and Reproducible Analysis of Long Read RNA-Seq DataR01HG009937 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Michael Isaiah Love, Robert Patro · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
pathQTL: Integrative Multi-Omics Causal Inference of Molecular Mechanisms Leading to Neuropsychiatric IllnessR01MH118349 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LOVE, MICHAEL ISAIAH, STEIN, JASON LOUIS · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Biology of Race and Progression Associated Breast Tumor Gene ExpressionU01CA179715 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PEROU, CHARLES M, TROESTER, MELISSA A. · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NCI NIH HHS P01 CA151135NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS U01 CA179715NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009937NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between germline genetic variation and breast cancer survival is largely unknown, especially in understudied minority populations who often have poorer survival. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have interrogated breast cancer survival but often are underpowered due to subtype heterogeneity and clinical covariates and detect loci in non-coding regions that are difficult to interpret. Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) show increased power in detecting functionally relevant loci by leveraging expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) from external reference panels in relevant tissues. However, ancestry- or race-specific reference panels may be needed to draw correct inference in ancestrally diverse cohorts. Such panels for breast cancer are lacking.

resultsWe provide a framework for TWAS for breast cancer in diverse populations, using data from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS), a population-based cohort that oversampled black women. We perform eQTL analysis for 406 breast cancer-related genes to train race-stratified predictive models of tumor expression from germline genotypes. Using these models, we impute expression in independent data from CBCS and TCGA, accounting for sampling variability in assessing performance. These models are not applicable across race, and their predictive performance varies across tumor subtype. Within CBCS (N = 3,828), at a false discovery-adjusted significance of 0.10 and stratifying for race, we identify associations in black women near AURKA, CAPN13, PIK3CA, and SERPINB5 via TWAS that are underpowered in GWAS.

conclusionsWe show that carefully implemented and thoroughly validated TWAS is an efficient approach for understanding the genetics underpinning breast cancer outcomes in diverse populations.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPolymorphism, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociReproducibility of ResultsBreast cancerExpression quantitative trait loci (eQTL)Polygenic traitsSurvivalTranscriptome-wide analysis (TWAS)

Identifiers

PMID32079541
PMCPMC7033948
OpenAlexW3012440143

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.