Evidence mapPaperPMID 32085772Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular diabetology2020

The atherogenic index of plasma plays an important role in predicting the prognosis of type 2 diabetic subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from an observational cohort study in China.

Zheng Qin, Kuo Zhou, Yueping Li, Wanjun Cheng, Zhijian Wang, Jianlong Wang, Fei Gao, Lixia Yang, Yingkai Xu, Yafeng Wu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zheng QinDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Kuo ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yueping LiDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Wanjun ChengDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Zhijian WangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Jianlong WangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Fei GaoDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Lixia YangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yingkai XuDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yafeng WuDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Hua HeDepartment of Emergency Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yujie ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Coronary Atherosclerotlic Disease, Clinical Center for Coronary Heart Disease, Capital Medical University, No. 2 Anzhen Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. azzyj12@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9545-1984
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies have reported the predictive value of the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) in the progression of atherosclerosis and the prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the utility of the AIP for prediction is unknown after PCI among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

methods2356 patients with T2DM who underwent PCI were enrolled and followed up for 4 years. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (MACCEs), considered to be a combination of cardiogenic death, myocardial infarction, repeated revascularization, and stroke. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-target vessel revascularization (non-TVR). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modelling found that the AIP was correlated with prognosis and verified by multiple models. According to the optimal cut-off point of the ROC curve, the population was divided into high/low-AIP groups. A total of 821 pairs were successfully matched using propensity score matching. Then, survival analysis was performed on both groups.

resultsThe overall incidence of MACCEs was 20.50% during a median of 47.50 months of follow-up. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis before matching suggested that the AIP was an independent risk factor for the prognosis of T2DM after PCI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.528, 95% CI 1.100-2.123, P = 0.011). According to the survival analysis of the matched population, the prognosis of the high AIP group was significantly worse than that of the low AIP group (HR (95% CI) 1.614 (1.303-2.001), P < 0.001), and the difference was mainly caused by repeat revascularization. The low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level did not affect the prognosis of patients with T2DM (P = 0.169), and the effect of the AIP on prognosis was also not affected by LDL-C level (P < 0.001).

conclusionsThe AIP, a comprehensive index of lipid management in patients with T2DM, affects prognosis after PCI. The prognosis of diabetic patients with high levels of the AIP included more MACCEs and was not affected by LDL-C levels. It is recommended to monitor the AIP for lipid management in diabetic patients after PCI and ensure that the AIP is not higher than 0.318. Trial registration This is an observational cohort study that does not involve interventions. So we didn't register. We guarantee that the research is authentic and reliable, and hope that your journal can give us a chance.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedBeijingBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DyslipidemiasFemaleHumansIncidenceLipidsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRisk AssessmentBiomarkersBlood GlucoseLipidsAtherogenic index of plasmaMajor cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID32085772
PMCPMC7035714
OpenAlexW3012899833

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.