Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32090725›Full record

ArticlePalliative & supportive care2020

Effect of instrumental support on distress among family caregivers: Findings from a nationally representative study.

Erin E Kent, Michelle A Mollica, J Nicholas Dionne-Odom, Rebecca A Ferrer, Roxanne E Jensen, Katherine A Ornstein, Ashley Wilder Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Factors associated with psychological distress in caregivers of patients with malignant gliomas.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Erin E KentDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-2503-2191
Michelle A MollicaOutcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
J Nicholas Dionne-OdomSchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0001-6764-0254
Rebecca A FerrerBiobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Roxanne E JensenOutcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Katherine A OrnsteinIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Ashley Wilder SmithOutcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
National Cancer Institute · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Implementing Palliative Care: Learning Collaborative vs. Technical AssistanceR01CA229197 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ZUBKOFF, LISA · 2018 to 2024
$3.0M
Home, but homebound: The impact of caregiving, financial, and community resources on the lives of individuals with dementiaR01AG060967 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ORNSTEIN, KATHERINE A · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
An Upstream Palliative Care Intervention for Rural Family CaregiversR00NR015903 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ODOM, JAMES N. · 2018 to 2020
$727k
Downstream effects of end-of-life patient treatment intensity on family membersK01AG047923 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ORNSTEIN, KATHERINE A · 2014 to 2018
$581k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229197NIA NIH HHS K01 AG047923NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060967NINR NIH HHS R00 NR015903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveA priority focus on palliative and supportive care is helping the 43.5 million caregivers who care for individuals with serious illness. Lacking support may lead to caregiver distress and poorer care delivery to patients with serious illness. We examined the potential of instrumental support (assistance with material and task performance) to mitigate distress among caregivers.

methodWe analyzed data from the nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS V2, 2018). Informal/family caregivers were identified in HINTS V2 if they indicated they were caring for or making healthcare decisions for another adult with a health problem. We used the PROMIS® instrumental support four-item short-form T-scores and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) for distress. We examined multivariable linear regression models for associations between distress and instrumental support, adjusted for sampling weights, socio-demographics, and caregiving variables (care recipient health condition(s), years caregiving (≥2), relationship to care recipient, and caregiver burden). We examined interactions between burden and instrumental support on caregiver distress level.

resultsOur analyses included 311 caregivers (64.8% female, 64.9% non-Hispanic White). The unweighted mean instrumental support T-score was 50.4 (SD = 10.6, range = 29.3-63.3); weighted mean was 51.2 (SE = 1.00). Lower instrumental support (p < 0.01), younger caregiver age (p < 0.04), higher caregiving duration (p = 0.008), and caregiver unemployment (p = 0.006) were significantly associated with higher caregiver distress. Mean instrumental support scores by distress levels were 52.3 (within normal limits), 49.4 (mild), 48.9 (moderate), and 39.7 (severe). The association between instrumental support and distress did not differ by caregiver burden level.

conclusionsPoor instrumental support is associated with high distress among caregivers, suggesting the need for palliative and supportive care interventions to help caregivers leverage instrumental support.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdultAgedCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Health QuestionnaireStress, PsychologicalCaregivingInstrumental supportPatient-reported outcomesPsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID32090725
PMCPMC12466190
OpenAlexW3007403388

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.