Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32098628›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2020

Perspectives on the prospective development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology: a qualitative focus group study with physical therapists and individuals with stroke.

Dennis R Louie, Marie-Louise Bird, Carlo Menon, Janice J Eng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. HabitSense: A Privacy-Aware, AI-Enhanced Multimodal Wearable Platform for mHealth Applications.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2024
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Design of a Wearable Vibrotactile Stimulation Device for Individuals With Upper-Limb Hemiparesis and Spasticity.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dennis R LouieGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Marie-Louise BirdRehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Research Lab, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 4255 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 2G9, Canada.
Carlo MenonMenrva lab, Schools of Mechatronic Systems and Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Metro Vancouver, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Janice J EngRehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Research Lab, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 4255 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 2G9, Canada. janice.eng@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2093-0788
Simon Fraser University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CAUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada CHRP 523669-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable activity monitors that track step count can increase the wearer's physical activity and motivation but are infrequently designed for the slower gait speed and compensatory patterns after stroke. New and available technology may allow for the design of stroke-specific wearable monitoring devices, capable of detecting more than just step counts, which may enhance how rehabilitation is delivered. The objective of this study was to identify important considerations in the development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology for rehabilitation, from the perspective of physical therapists and individuals with stroke.

methodsA qualitative research design with focus groups was used to collect data. Five focus groups were conducted, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using content analysis to generate overarching categories representing the stakeholder considerations for the development of stroke-specific wearable monitor technology for the lower extremity.

resultsA total of 17 physical therapists took part in four focus group discussions and three individuals with stroke participated in the fifth focus group. Our analysis identified four main categories for consideration: 1) 'Variability' described the heterogeneity of patient presentation, therapy approaches, and therapeutic goals that are taken into account for stroke rehabilitation; 2) 'Context of use' described the different settings and purposes for which stakeholders could foresee employing stroke-specific wearable technology; 3) 'Crucial design features' identified the measures, functions, and device characteristics that should be considered for incorporation into prospective technology to enhance uptake; and 4) 'Barriers to adopting technology' highlighted challenges, including personal attitudes and design flaws, that may limit the integration of current and future wearable monitoring technology into clinical practice.

conclusionsThe findings from this qualitative study suggest that the development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology is viewed positively by physical therapists and individuals with stroke. While a single, specific device or function may not accommodate all the variable needs of therapists and their clients, it was agreed that wearable monitoring technology could enhance how physical therapists assess and treat their clients. Future wearable devices should be developed in consideration of the highlighted design features and potential barriers for uptake.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignPhysical TherapistsWearable Electronic DevicesAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQualitative ResearchStroke RehabilitationFitness trackerRemote sensing technologyStrokeWalkingWearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID32098628
PMCPMC7041185
OpenAlexW3012603921

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.