ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020
Use of a K-nearest neighbors model to predict the development of type 2 diabetes within 2 years in an obese, hypertensive population.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive ability of current machine learning algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2022Pooled it
- Supervised Learning Algorithm Comparison in Discharge Status Prediction of Trauma Patients: Empirical Evaluation.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of in-hospital mortality for critically ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Impact and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Based on Machine Learning Analysis of a Time Series: A Population-Based Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Enhancing diagnostic accuracy in symptom-based health checkers: a comprehensive machine learning approach with clinical vignettes and benchmarking.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- A Machine Learning Approach to Assess Patients with Deep Neck Infection Progression to Descending Mediastinitis: Preliminary Results.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Recent applications of machine learning and deep learning models in the prediction, diagnosis, and management of diabetes: a comprehensive review.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2022Review
- Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Need for Tracheostomy in Patients of Deep Neck Infection Based on Clinical and Computed Tomography Findings-Preliminary Data and a Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predicting the Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Elderly Using Machine Learning Techniques.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Identification of Prediabetes Discussions in Unstructured Clinical Documentation: Validation of a Natural Language Processing Algorithm.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- A novel multistage ensemble approach for prediction and classification of diabetes.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Unraveling the Factors Determining Development of Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Through Machine-Learning Techniques.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Machine learning for diabetes clinical decision support: a review.Advances in computational intelligence · 2022Review
- Machine learning and deep learning predictive models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Prediabetes is a type of hyperglycemia in which patients have blood glucose levels above normal but below the threshold for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Prediabetic patients are considered to be at high risk for developing T2DM, but not all will eventually do so. Because it is difficult to identify which patients have an increased risk of developing T2DM, we developed a model of several clinical and laboratory features to predict the development of T2DM within a 2-year period. We used a supervised machine learning algorithm to identify at-risk patients from among 1647 obese, hypertensive patients. The study period began in 2005 and ended in 2018. We constrained data up to 2 years before the development of T2DM. Then, using a time series analysis with the features of every patient, we calculated one linear regression line and one slope per feature. Features were then included in a K-nearest neighbors classification model. Feature importance was assessed using the random forest algorithm. The K-nearest neighbors model accurately classified patients in 96% of cases, with a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 78%, positive predictive value of 96%, and negative predictive value of 94%. The random forest algorithm selected the homeostatic model assessment-estimated insulin resistance, insulin levels, and body mass index as the most important factors, which in combination with KNN had an accuracy of 99% with a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 97%. We built a prognostic model that accurately identified obese, hypertensive patients at risk for developing T2DM within a 2-year period. Clinicians may use machine learning approaches to better assess risk for T2DM and better manage hypertensive patients. Machine learning algorithms may help health care providers make more informed decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.