ArticleClinical endoscopy2020
Effect of Aspiration Therapy on Obesity-Related Comorbidities: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Duodenal mucosal ablation: An emerging therapeutic concept for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Impact of Bariatric Surgery and Endoscopic Therapies on Liver Health in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The evolution and current state of bariatric endoscopy in Western countries.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Review
- Endobariatric systems: Strategic integration of endoscopic therapies in the management of obesity.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Update on Endoscopic Treatments for Obesity.Current obesity reports · 2024Review
- Role of endoscopic duodenojejunal bypass liner in obesity management and glycemic control.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Review
- Endoscopic removal of a weight-loss device with stoma closure using a tack-and-suture device.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2023Article
- Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Obesity management for cardiovascular disease prevention.Obesity pillars · 2023Review
- Updates in Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Advances in endobariatrics: past, present, and future.Gastroenterology report · 2023Review
- Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies for Liver Disease: Mechanisms, Benefits, and Associated Risks.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2022Review
- Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) for High-Risk Patients, High Body Mass Index (> 50 kg/mObesity surgery · 2021Article
- Various Novel and Emerging Technologies in Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Treatments.Clinical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Bariatric and metabolic endoscopy: impact on obesity and related comorbidities.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsAspiration therapy (AT) involves endoscopic placement of a gastrostomy tube with an external device that allows patients to drain 30% of ingested calories after meals. Its efficacy for inducing weight loss has been shown. This study aimed to assess the effect of AT on obesity-related comorbidities.
methodsA meta-analysis of studies that assessed AT outcomes was conducted through December 2018. Primary outcomes were changes in comorbidities at 1 year following AT. Secondary outcomes were the amount of weight loss at up to 4 years and pooled serious adverse events (SAEs).
resultsFive studies with 590 patients were included. At 1 year, there were improvements in metabolic conditions: mean difference (MD) in systolic blood pressure: -7.8 (-10.7 - -4.9) mm Hg; MD in diastolic blood pressure: -5.1 (-7.0 - 3.2) mm Hg; MD in triglycerides: -15.8 (-24.0 - -7.6) mg/dL; MD in high-density lipoprotein: 3.6 (0.7-6.6) mg/dL; MD in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): -1.3 (-1.8 - -0.8) %; MD in aspartate transaminase: -2.7 (-4.1 - -1.3) U/L; MD in alanine transaminase: -7.5 (-9.8 - -5.2) U/L. At 1 (n=218), 2 (n=125), 3 (n=46), and 4 (n=27) years, the patients experienced 17.8%, 18.3%, 19.1%, and 18.6% total weight loss (TWL), corresponding to 46.3%, 46.2%, 48.0%, and 48.7% excess weight loss (EWL) (p<0.0001 for all). Subgroup analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials (n=225) showed that AT patients lost more weight than did controls by 11.6 (6.5-16.7) %TWL and 25.6 (16.0-35.3) %EWL and experienced greater improvement in HbA1c and alanine transaminase by 1.3 (0.8-1.8) % and 9.0 (3.9-14.0) U/L. The pooled SAE rate was 4.1%.
conclusionObesity-related comorbidities significantly improved at 1 year following AT. Additionally, a subgroup of patients who continued to use AT appeared to experience significant weight loss that persisted up to at least 4 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.