Evidence mapPaperPMID 32107265Full record

Trial reportBMJ open diabetes research & care2020

Effectiveness of a clinic-based randomized controlled intervention for type 2 diabetes management: an innovative model of intensified diabetes management in Mainland China (C-IDM study).

Qinglin Lou, Qing Ye, Haidi Wu, Zhiyong Wang, Robert S Ware, Yaqing Xiong, Fei Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qinglin Lou *Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qing Ye *Non-Communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.
Haidi Wu *Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhiyong WangNon-Communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.
Robert S WareGriffith University Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Yaqing XiongGeriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China xiongyaqingnj@126.com f.xufei@gmail.com.
Fei XuNon-Communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China xiongyaqingnj@126.com f.xufei@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1785-3635
Nanjing Medical University · CNNanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control And Prevention · CNGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHighly efficient diabetes management programs are needed for tackling diabetes in China. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a clinic-based intensified diabetes management model (C-IDM) in Mainland China. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA 2-year clinic-based randomized controlled trial was conducted among patients with type 2 diabetes in Nanjing, China. The C-IDM intervention components comprised four domains (disease targeting management, express referral channel, expert visit, patients' self-management) and an integrated running system (disease control centers, general hospitals and local clinics). Control group participants received their usual care, while intervention participants received both the C-IDM package and the usual services. The primary outcome variable was change of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Mixed-effects models were used to compute effect estimates and 95% CI with consideration of both individual and cluster-level confounders.

resultsOverall, 1095 of 1143 participants were assessed at study completion. The mean change in HbA1c was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group (mean difference (MD)=-0.57, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.36). Similar results were observed for change in body mass index (MD=-0.29, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.10). Participants in the intervention group were more likely to achieve normal HbA1c and body weight compared with their counterparts in control group after adjusting for potentially confounding variables (adjusted OR=1.94, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.81 and 1.79, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.85, respectively).

conclusionsThe C-IDM model is feasible and effective in large-scale management of patients with type 2 diabetes in China. It has public health implications for tackling the burden of diabetes in China. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-IOR-15006019.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementModels, TheoreticalAgedBody Mass IndexBody WeightChinaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Feasibility StudiesFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf CareSelf-ManagementTreatment OutcomeGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanChinaclinic-baseddiabetes careinterventionmanagement model

Identifiers

PMID32107265
PMCPMC7206907
OpenAlexW3008997158

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.