Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32108422›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020

The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Emmanuel A Andreadis, Charalampia V Geladari, Epameinondas T Angelopoulos

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020
    Review
  5. More reasons to use automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emmanuel A AndreadisHypertension and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Center, Athens Medical Group, Psychiko Clinic, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5436-2889
Charalampia V GeladariHypertension and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Center, Athens Medical Group, Psychiko Clinic, Athens, Greece.
Epameinondas T AngelopoulosHypertension and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Center, Athens Medical Group, Psychiko Clinic, Athens, Greece.
Athens Medical Center · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This evidence-based article endorses the use of automated office blood pressure (AOBP). AOBP is the most favorable office blood pressure (BP) measuring technique as it provides accurate readings with 3-15 mm Hg lower values than the casual conventional office measurements with auscultatory or semi-automated oscillometric devices and relates closely to awake ABP readings. The AOBP technique seems to be superior to conventional office BP in predicting hypertension-mediated organ damage and appears to be equally reliable to awake ABP in the prediction of cardiovascular (CV) disease. AOBP readings should be obtained either unattended, with the patient alone in the examination room, or attended with the presence of personnel in the room but with no talking to the patient, although this recommendation is not frequently followed in routine clinical practice. To optimize office BP readings, the type of device, the rest period before AOBP measurements (preceding rest), and the time intervals between measurements were evaluated. As AOBP readings have the advantage of removing many confounding factors, the authors propose to perform measurements with a preceding rest in all patients at the initial visit; if AOBP readings remain <130 mm Hg in subsequent visits, measurements could be accepted, otherwise, if are higher, patients should be evaluated by out-of-office BP measurements.

Indexed as

HypertensionAutomationBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationHumansOffice Visitsautomated office blood pressureblood pressure measurement/monitoringhypertensionobserver presencerest

Identifiers

PMID32108422
PMCPMC8029694
OpenAlexW3008816773

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.