Trial reportEuropean heart journal2020
Integrated management of atrial fibrillation in primary care: results of the ALL-IN cluster randomized trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nurse-led atrial fibrillation clinics in primary health care: a review of the evidence.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical service organisation for adults with atrial fibrillation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Does a nurse-led interventional program improve clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation? A meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Guideline
- 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Guideline
- A Systematic Review of Economic Aspects of Service Interventions to Increase Anticoagulation Use in Atrial Fibrillation.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of Integrated Care on Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Optimization of vitamin K antagonist treatment: Near patient monitoring versus standard of care a parallel group clinical trial in older patients with atrial fibrillation.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Telemedicine-based integrated management of atrial fibrillation in village clinics: a cluster randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- Effect of targeted education of patients with atrial fibrillation on unplanned cardiovascular outcomes: results of the multicentre randomized AF-EduCare trial.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Integrated care in patients with atrial fibrillation- a predictive heterogeneous treatment effect analysis of the ALL-IN trial.PloS one · 2023Trial
- Mobile health technology-supported atrial fibrillation screening and integrated care: A report from the mAFA-II trial Long-term Extension Cohort.European journal of internal medicine · 2020Trial
- Integrated Cardiopulmonary Profile as an Additive Signal in Patients Evaluated for Suspected Newly Detected Atrial Fibrillation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
- Sex Differences in Individuals at High Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: A Primary Care Community Cohort Study, 2015-2024.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary Atrial Fibrillation Clinics: A Model for Comprehensive Management.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- The Influence of Risk Factor Modification on Atrial Fibrillation Outcomes and Their Impact on the Success of Catheter Ablation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Integrated Care in Atrial Fibrillation: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Improve Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Global, regional, and national burden of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter from 1990 to 2021: sex differences and global burden projections to 2046-a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Impact of lifestyle risk factors on atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms and prevention approaches - A narrative review.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo evaluate whether integrated care for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be safely orchestrated in primary care. METHODS AND
resultsThe ALL-IN trial was a cluster randomized, open-label, pragmatic non-inferiority trial performed in primary care practices in the Netherlands. We randomized 26 practices: 15 to the integrated care intervention and 11 to usual care. The integrated care intervention consisted of (i) quarterly AF check-ups by trained nurses in primary care, also focusing on possibly interfering comorbidities, (ii) monitoring of anticoagulation therapy in primary care, and finally (iii) easy-access availability of consultations from cardiologists and anticoagulation clinics. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during 2 years of follow-up. In the intervention arm, 527 out of 941 eligible AF patients aged ≥65 years provided informed consent to undergo the intervention. These 527 patients were compared with 713 AF patients in the control arm receiving usual care. Median age was 77 (interquartile range 72-83) years. The all-cause mortality rate was 3.5 per 100 patient-years in the intervention arm vs. 6.7 per 100 patient-years in the control arm [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.82]. For non-cardiovascular mortality, the adjusted HR was 0.47 (95% CI 0.27-0.82). For other adverse events, no statistically significant differences were observed.
conclusionIn this cluster randomized trial, integrated care for elderly AF patients in primary care showed a 45% reduction in all-cause mortality when compared with usual care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.