SynthesisMedicine2020
Prognostic significance of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein in patients with gastrointestinal tract cancers: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Study of the Effectiveness of Apoptosis Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer in Kazakhstan: A Review of Systematic Evidence.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Review
- SLC2A3 promotes head and neck squamous cancer developing through negatively regulating CD8Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the prognostic significance of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) in patients with gastrointestinal tract (GIT) cancers.
methodsPubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for potentially eligible literature. The baseline characteristics and relevant data were extracted. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the prognostic role of XIAP in patients with GIT cancers.
resultsTwelve studies with 2,477 patients were included. The pooled HRs of higher expression of XIAP for overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) in patients with GIT cancers were 1.64 (95% CI, 1.27-2.13) and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.96-1.16), respectively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were also performed. No significant publication bias was found.
conclusionOur results suggested that XIAP could be a prognostic marker for OS but not RFS in patients with GIT cancers. Higher expression of XIAP was related to poorer OS. These findings may help evaluate the prognosis of patients and assist future research on novel therapeutic strategies of GIT cancers by targeting XIAP. However, more well-designed studies are warranted to verify the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.