Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32130262›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The significance and expectations of HIV cure research among people living with HIV in Australia.

Jennifer Power, Gary W Dowsett, Andrew Westle, Joseph D Tucker, Sophie Hill, Jeremy Sugarman, Sharon R Lewin, Graham Brown, Jayne Lucke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jennifer PowerAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6566-3214
Gary W DowsettAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew WestleAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Joseph D TuckerInstitute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2804-1181
Sophie HillCentre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jeremy SugarmanBerman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Sharon R LewinThe Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Graham BrownAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jayne LuckeAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
La Trobe University · AUJohns Hopkins University · USThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most people living with HIV (PLHIV) with reliable access to antiretroviral treatment (ART) have a life expectancy similar to uninfected populations. Despite this, HIV can negatively affect their social and psychological wellbeing. This study aimed to enhance understanding of the expectations PLHIV hold for HIV cure research and the implications this has for HIV cure research trials. We interviewed 20 Australian PLHIV about their expectations for HIV cure research outcomes and the impact a potential cure for HIV may have on their everyday lives. Data were analysed thematically, using both inductive and deductive approaches. The significance of a cure for HIV was expressed by participants as something that would offer relief from their sense of vigilance or uncertainty about their health into the future. A cure was also defined in social terms, as alleviation from worry about potential for onward HIV transmission, concerns for friends and family, and the negative impact of HIV-related stigma. Participants did not consider sustained medication-free viral suppression (or remission) as a cure for HIV because this did not offer certainty in remaining virus free in a way that would alleviate these fears and concerns. A cure was seen as complete elimination of HIV from the body. There is an ethical need to consider the expectations of PLHIV in design of, and recruitment for, HIV cure-related research. The language used to describe HIV cure research should differentiate the long-term aspiration of achieving complete elimination of HIV from the body and possible shorter-term therapeutic advances, such as achieving medication free viral suppression.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchAdultAustraliaFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial StigmaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32130262
PMCPMC7055878
OpenAlexW3010320768

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.